[ad_1]
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania announced Wednesday that the Ministry had committed no crime for the execution of a cervid in Garliava District, six years ago . "All the convicts made it clear that they were gathered to observe how the decision would be executed, whose actions were not determined with the intention of preventing the taking of the anthill, but the desire to express dissatisfaction with the content of the court's decision, to attract the attention of the public and at the same time the bailiffs. "The court of first instance rightly concluded that such acts of particulars do not contain any indication on the nature of the offense, "- noted the court of cbadation.
The first instance of the fifth person who prevented the Antstole from enforcing a judgment was acquitted and sentenced by the Appellate Body.Only one of the eleven people filed an appeal in cbadation, the CSE responded to their complaints.They are acquitted by leaving the verdict of the court of first instance valid. three perso nnes were acquitted by leaving the verdict of the trial court, a person whose actions differed from all others (he used physical violence), remained in force in the appeal instance.
"The presence in the crowd, standing in the hands, can only be seen by the hands of a man," said the LAT
. as a general act of a group of individuals for each individually endorsing only the very existence. However, such a presence does not mean the action of a person who has used physical force against a bailiff, "says LAT, noting that the entire congregation can not be considered a collaborator of the person who used violence
.A behavior that prevents the bailiff from executing a court decision and recognizes this behavior as criminal must not only badess the obstacles faced by the bailiff but also the context of the event
"It is also necessary to take into account the entities that make interruptions: they are persons whose interests are directly related to the content of the executed decision, that it is important to know. act of others whose interests are not directly affected by the judgment. It is only by taking fully into account all of these circumstances that it is possible to establish a sufficiently serious danger of the criminal offense, including a deliberate culprit, for which it is established that the culprit understands that it prevents the bailiff from executing a valid court order and wishes to do so. The regularity of the acts of the bailiff and the choice of the execution of a decision are also an important circumstance to appreciate the danger and the fault of the person who has interrupted his activities, "says the judgment
According to the LAT, bailiffs must be executed The decision was very sensitive in society, it provoked controversial badessments based on different social, political and social beliefs.
On December 16, 2011, the court of Kedainiai district ordered the daughter of Drąsius Kedys and L. Stankūnaitė, under the auspices of his father D.Kedys Nurse Venckiene, a native of the Kaunas Regional Court, was transferred to his mother Despite some of the resistance of society, the decision was taken on May 17, 2012.
[ad_2]
Source link
