[ad_1]
This policy is written on the Facebook account of the social network. However, R. Alekna says that R. Karbauskas simply lied. The "farmer" Agnė Širinskienė revealed a letter from the Patient's Cashier to the Presidential Advisor, which showed that the head of the country was interested only in the fate of the two institutions after the reform
"President's Decision to veto the seven laws adopted by the Seimas on health reform and the reorganization of medical institutions, does not rest on the state's interest in providing affordable and quality medical services to the country. public but on the desire to protect private interests in the field of health, motivating only the freedom of choice of patients. – R. Karbauskis
not everyone, namely the interests of the conservative, former mayor of Vilnius and former health minister Raimundas Aleknas.
"It is unfortunate that the President has chosen the arguments of those who are more likely to open the doors of the presidency.For example, the health reform has been particularly affected by UAB Socialiniai ir sveikatos projektai, also known as the Oakuolė Clinic, which deals with Raimundas Alekna, the former Conservative Health Minister and advisor to A. Kubilius. "
Alekna says that the president of the LSU has simply
"I can add my hand to my heart and say that I have never been to any of his mandates as President Dali Grybauskaitė. Here is his complete lie to make people cleaner by shading others. Absolutely I did not have any contact with the president. I think that he has all the bits and pieces of which he communicated between the journalists and among the politicians, that there had been any form of communication in any form he would already be introduced. Here are some points to highlight. I am not even inconvenienced for him, "commented R. Alekna.
Luko April / 15min. / Ramandas Alekna
Posted a letter to the Presidential Advisor
Member of Seimas Agne Shirinskiene 15min said Tuesday evening that R. Karbauskis was not really lying.The letter from the specialist of this institution was sent accidentally by a letter from the specialist of this institution to the counselor presidential election Ayra Mečeienė
15min photo / Response to the presidential request
According to A. Širinskienė, this letter makes it clear that the President was only interested in By lot of two private health facilities if the reform had taken place.
"The question seems to concern two health care institutions, one of which is badociated with R. Alekna. It is clear from the answer that in practice the Oak Clinic would have experienced a lot of difficulties and could have reviewed its strategy if the reform had taken place because the transition to outpatient services in such a clinic would be difficult in a surprisingly short period, "said A.Shirinskienė 19659002] The presidency does not comment on the statements of R. Karbauskas and A. Shirinskienė and the advertising letter
Wants to reject the veto
Karbauskis does not hide the fact that the Seimas will have enough votes to reject the president's veto According to Karbauskis, the reform of health facilities should become a way to improve the quality of treatment, while providing quality and consultation conditions to the inhabitants of the regions with the best specialists
"The aim was to strengthen the public health sector. it is possible to ensure the availability of equal services for all, among them and low-income people who can not afford to pay for private clinics. The reform aimed to ensure that, although there are vacancies in public hospitals, private hospitals would not be eligible for funding from the compulsory health insurance fund for the same services, ensuring thus the viability of the public sector. The badertion that there is a list of destroyed hospitals and aspirations to reduce the number of hospitals is unreasonable ", – says the head of the LSSR in Facebook account
" It is unfortunate that the President has not taken into account the formation of a new government in the areas with which the ministry will seek together solutions that meet the needs of the local community ", adds R. Karbauskis
Presidential argument – Constitution
Leading Party D.Grybauskaitė vetoed the last on Tuesday. Sigismund Gedvilla / 15min back / Dalia Grybauskaitė "rel =" happy image "src =" https://s1.15min.lt/static/cache/NTcweCw0OTZ4MzkxLDcyMTg4OCxvcmlnaW5hbCwsaWQ9Mzk2ODEyMCZkYXRlPTIwMTglMkYwNiUyRjEyLDE1MzkyOTg2Njg=/dalios-grybauskaites-metinis-pranesimas-5b1f779e6a70e.jpg "style = "width: auto; height: auto; "/>
Žygimantas Gedvila / 15min foto / Dalia Grybauskaitė
The reasons for the return of the amendments to the Seimas have become the laws of the Republic of Lithuania on the grounds that the amendments to the law conflict possible with the Constitution "With acting budget funds, there is one, so of course, the state – the government and the Seimas – can also take care of the monopoly situation of the institutions of the country. ;State. But when it comes to health insurance funds, they are the property of a citizen who pays for health insurance, and to confiscate or coerce somebody to get them. return to a state or other institution, indicate where to go. .) This is the biggest intersection with constitutional norms, "said Tuesday the state chief on LRT radio.
The president hopes the Seimas will correct its criticized laws at the session. So that the transformation can begin in January, I also support the efforts of the Minister to do this – similarly, it was simply done in an uncoordinated way, interpreting and applying, apparently inaccurately , jurisprudence and interpretations of the Constitutional Court in 2013 and 2014. Therefore, according to the presidential adviser, Rasos Svetikaitė, it is necessary to establish the qualitative criteria that the corresponding medical institutions could ask in the care sector
In explaining the presidential veto, a counselor told reporters that the state does not have the right to report to a person in which The health facility must receive health care.
"The Constitution guarantees the right of the patient: public or private health institution (…) The reorganization of medical institutions must be carried out according to clear, objective, known and non-discriminatory criteria for safe healthcare, of quality and affordability provided for by law, and not by individual decisions of the Minister of Health or political interests. "(R.Svetikaitė
