[ad_1]
Deputy Director of Administration, Mr Velička, announced Monday that at the previous press conference, Director A. Bartulis had canceled the signature of his deputy.
Why "The reason for the cancellation of my signature is the letter signed on November 15 stating that the arena Šiauliai, under the license agreement, has not filed report for 2017", has reminded the MP.
Declared the mayor's arguments, he saw the interests
According to him, the law on public institutions stipulates that the public report of the previous year must be submitted no later than 1 May.
Already in another official report, Ms. Velicka had claimed and asked her boss to immediately stop the allegedly illegal actions and start defending the interests of the municipality. These illegal actions constitute a peaceful agreement with the officials of Šiauliai Arena.
Earlier, he had indicated that, in his previous letter and signature, he sought to guarantee the legitimate aim of the city of Šiauliai and asked the official to fulfill his legal obligations – to file a late report and pay a fine for no -meaning.
Šiauliai Arena
"I would like to draw your attention to the fact that you have done your job irresponsibly and potentially criminally, because without the legal basis, you have been able to transfer the monthly concession fee from the municipal budget", wrote Mr. Velička .
Later, he clarified his actions in other words: "As a lawyer, I did not have to pay a franchise fee until I received the report from. 39; said.
To my knowledge, the costs of the Šiauliai arena management model are the highest of any arena in the country. Next week, I will give you specific data. "
Marijus Velička
Mr Velička claims without argument from the mayor and the director why the peace agreement with the governors of the Šiauliai arena was signed: "The main argument – the arena will stop acting if we refuse and we will probably not accept any debt What other arguments?
I told the mayor this way – I'm afraid that a person in his life will change dramatically in two cases. One when the arguments are heard, if not, when an interest arises to a person. In this case, I do not see the arguments, so I see an interest. "
Mayor: the material is "fake"
Mayor A. Visock organized a press conference for decades, stating at the end that all material presented against him and the director was "fake". His report was entitled "On the political situation".
What exactly is this "fake"? Why did the Mayor say that he did not trust Mr. Velčka from his first day of work? He did not answer these questions. It has only been said that powerful lawyers are behind all this and this is a matter of political corruption for the benefit of the outside world.
The mayor claimed that he wanted to destroy the aura of Šiauliai: "Now, the aura of Šiauliai is good! I have this information on Velicka since my first day of work. J & # 39; I have mostly tolerated that, he can do good deeds, but he has been stuck elsewhere. "
None of the tolerated errors were mentioned, but the mayor stated that Mr. Velička did not control the Jan Janis gymnasium, resulting in a loss of about 220,000 people. financing in euros.
You have to drive Siauliai?
A. Bartulis was specific. He argued that Mr Velička had indicated the bad parts of the contract because the last Deputy 15 minutes In fact recognized.
Alvydas Januševičius / Photo of 15min / Antanas Bartulis
In addition, the director saw the tone of his deputy: "immediately" to do something. He opposed accusations of defeat in a peace agreement with the director of Šiauliai Arena.
A.Bartulis pointed out that "Entertainment Island" did not fundamentally violate the contract and that, upon termination of the contract, could again claim to exploit the object. Now this is excluded.
He also explained that it was not necessary to buy an expensive international audit company at the present time, which is why it would not be necessary.
"Mr. Velicka, when he took the city, reacted without taking into account the changing situation with the head of the Šiauliai Arena," said A. Bartulis, pointing out that confidence in the MP had diminished but that it was perhaps important to work together.
Siauliai manages four people?
After the press conference, Mr Vericka confirmed that he did not intend to resign or defend his position on the issue of arena Šiauliai. In his opinion, this would constitute a defense of the public interest.
He also thought that J. Janonis' gym repair had occurred only because the best contractors had refused to run the winning bid call. The winner of third place was not very good at that time.
"Until today, I did not do anything that did not belong to me.I was thrown out of the coordination of the Šiauliai arena." was decided by four members of the commission and the council voted as it was submitted – said Mr Velička, pointing out and recalling that of this situation recently, 15 members of the council opposed the mayor and his relatives politically. Board members understood that they were being decided and I was removed from duty, although it is my duty. "
[ad_2]
Source link
