[ad_1]
The Supreme Court of Lithuania (LAT) refused to accept a complaint from the Department of Police in a case concerning the payment of compensation to mothers who lost their mothers
After the verdict, the judgment of the Klaipėda Regional Court issued on March 20 remains valid. It was decided that the police and the state will have to compensate the immaterial damages to the children of the murdered woman in case of police badistance.
The state and the police will have to pay 110 thousand euros to children killed by the police – 25 thousand. three children and 35 thousand euros Euro – for another child
The police department filed an appeal in cbadation before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court representative, Dovilė Bružaitė, informed the SNB that the complaint had been rejected because the cbadation appeal does not raise legal issues that correspond to at least one examination of the case.
According to the Code of Civil Procedure, judicial and administrative decisions are reviewed in cbadation when there is a violation of the rules of a substantive or procedural law essential to the interpretation and interpretation of the law. application uniform law, if this violation may have influenced the adoption of an illegal decision. Similarly, if the court in the judgment under appeal moved away from the practice of applying and interpreting the law formulated by the Supreme Court or the practice of the Supreme Court is unequal with the contested legal question.
Her husband Povilas Valeika was killed in February 2013 in Klaipėda District.
An intimidating woman called a helpless phone, asked her to defend her, but she did not receive any help from the police.
The Klaipėda Regional Court sentenced a man to death in February 2014 and sentenced him to 16 years in prison for the deliberate killing of a woman.
Klaipėda District Local Court in November 2014 The Klaipėda Regional Court ruled that one woman had specifically pleaded for the protection and protection of the state, while police officers were aware of the recurrence of male violence in the presence of young men
. "State aid should have been a priority, but the woman's request for help was not dealt with." The indifference of officials, the non-reaction created the conditions of the crime and contributed sufficiently to the occurrence of immaterial damage for the children, and the state, on behalf of which the police officers acted, had the duty to badume its responsibilities, "said the court the accused – the police and the murdered man – act as a whole, which determines the joint liability of the defendants.
The College also pointed out that joint and several liability is more protective of the victims. joint and several liability will help to ensure that the judgment is not only fair and lawful, but also enforceable, which is in the interests of the children, their right to non-pecuniary damage on time
. At presé nt experience tremendous pain, stress, anxiety, feelings of insecurity. Mother was tortured and murdered in front of them. If the smallest could not be very clear about this painful event, it is undeniable that the torture of a six-year-old mother hurt her much more severely. In addition, the child had to testify after the incident and then survive the events that occurred, so that he should be awarded higher moral damage ", – announced the court.
[ad_2]
Source link
