The US court ruled against Neringa Venckiene



[ad_1]

At the last sitting, the judge asked for more time, so the meeting was postponed for two weeks

The American journalist, Michael Tarma, was also watching the meeting on Thursday night. On the social network, he already reported to the judge that he had already ruled on Venckiene

One hour later, the judge asked for a five-minute break.

At the end of the hearing, the judge declared that the extradition would not be stopped. Tarmas

Received a strong reaction of the United States

N. Even two lawyers defend the United States. One of them works for free. "One of them is our political asylum lawyer.In the beginning we did it to him, but when he read the whole story of his mother, he offered to work for free, and a while ago, US Congressman Chris Smith introduced a bill to draw the attention of Congress to the case of former judge Neringa Venckiene and to Ending Extradition Document for the Committee on Legal Affairs Republican Ch. Smith presented on June 25

He also intends to release N. Venckienė. asks Venckiene to ask him if the United States will offer him asylum.

Congress Press for the Associated Press argued that N. Venckiene should be "congratulated and not judged for brave officers" to be held accountable to his niece

"Neringa Venckiene judges must be allowed to stay in the United States until the last decision on his application for asylum, "says the document. – She can not be detained in federal or state prisons, or arrested for crimes of immigration or extradition, must be able to move freely and be allowed to work until the last decision on l & # 39; asylum. "

N. Venckienė's son, DELFI, said that the statement of this congressman was a surprise.Although he heard about his interest, he was not expecting to see such a document already.

To his knowledge, the Congressman has been interested in this matter for several years.

K. Venckus DELFI stated that he did not speak personally with the member of the Congress

Shortly after this declaration, the US law came to the US court to amend another law of Congress.A similar condition was mentioned there

Lithuania was missing in April 2013

N.Venckiene lost his voice in April 2013, before the Seimas revoked his legal immunity.On May 10 this year, the Lithuanian police agency announced his research. February 15, 2018, the Kaunas District Court convicted the mother D. Kedis, Laimutė Kedienė and her neighbor Olga Girdauskiene, for having raped her daughter L. Stankūnaitė and D. Kedis' daughter and sentenced her to imprisonment.

Upon request, N. Venckiene was arrested in Chicago. US media said that the appearance of N. Venckienė had changed considerably during this period, but his son denied that. "The only thing that has changed, is that the hair is longer than usual in the photos.And it changed the color of the hair and wigs wore.Nothing", – DELFI was previously claimed by K. Venckus
Former judge and member of parliament, N. Venckienė, interviewed the US media in April. "I do not want to return to Lithuania anymore," she said at the time. an interview with the international press agency "The Associated Press" of the prison

A plague added that she would be happy to become an American citizen N. Venckienė said that, if issued, pedophiles would apply both by disclosure of their network and due diligence to pay attention to this problem during the 2012 election campaign, when his party "Drąsos kelias" received seven seats in parliament

N. Venckienė prosecutors suspected under thirteen articles of the Penal Code l

When he is transferred to Lithuania, the former judge can be tried for abusive and illegal collection and dissemination of information, for non-execution of judgment and for the purpose of prosecution. other crimes. Members of the Lithuanian security forces stated that she was suspected of having committed the following criminal acts:

Art. 1: Illegal collection of information about the privacy of a person liable to public works or a fine, or a restriction of liberty, arrest or detention. 39, a term of imprisonment of up to three years.

Article 168. 1: Disclosure or unlawful use of information about the privacy of a person, punishable by public works or a fine, a restriction of liberty, of Arrest or imprisonment for up to three years.

Article 313. 2: Contempt of the memory of the deceased, public dissemination of dead false accusations, subject to public works or fine, or restriction of liberty, or arrest.

Article 153: Personal offense of a person under the age of sixteen, subject to a restriction of liberty or

Article 163: Abuse of the rights or duties of parents, guardians or carers or other legitimate children, liable to A fine or a restriction of liberty, arrest or imprisonment for up to five years. 19659002] Article 232: Non-compliance with the judgment punishable by imprisonment or imprisonment for up to two years

Article 245: Failure to comply a non-punishable judgment, liable to public service or fines or restrictions of liberty or arrest.

Article 228. Day 2: Abuse for property or other personal gain, liable to a fine or imprisonment of up to one year. seven years.

Article 231. 1 st: interference in the activities of a judge, prosecutor, investigator, lawyer or bailiff, for which he is liable to public works or a fine or d & # 39; a restriction of liberty or a term of imprisonment of up to two years.

Article 140 1: to cause physical pain or minor disturbances of health, punishable by public works or the restriction of liberty, or arrest, or imprisonment up to one year
Article 286: Resistance to an official or a person is punishable by public works or fines, or imprisonment for up to three years.

Article 154. 2nd: Defamation of a person alleged to have committed a serious or very serious crime, through the press or the print media, for which he is fined or arrested, or d & # 39; a term of imprisonment of up to two years.

Article 236. 1: False appeal for defamation against the institution or the official entitled to prosecution, liable to fines or fines, or to a penalty of imprisonment. imprisonment for up to two years.

It is strictly forbidden to use information published by DELFI on other sites, media or distribute our material in any form without consent, and if consent is obtained, it is necessary to indicate DELFI as the source.

[ad_2]
Source link