[ad_1]
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney General's Office (AGC) today declared "false" a statement by former Attorney General Tan Sri Mohamed Ali Apandi regarding the request for review and the application interpretation of the International Charter. Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case of sovereignty over Pulau Batu Puteh (Pedra Branca), Middle Rocks and South Ledge.
The AGC referred to an article entitled "Malaysia ada bukti kukuh" (Malaysia has strong evidence) on July 1, 2018, in the newspaper Mingguan Malaysia based on an interview with Mohamed Apandi, and said that in the interview, Mohamed Apandi said that the ICJ was focused on the letter of Secretary Johor, dated 1953, sent to Singapore
"According to Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi, the letter indicated that Malaysia was not interested in Pedra Branca (Pulau Batu Puteh) auth The Acting Secretary of State of Johor and Malaysia lost the case for this reason [19659002] "The record shows that Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi's statement is not true. The Malaysian delegation has spent a lot of time on this issue before the ICJ. The arguments presented at the hearing of the original case are found in ICJ CR 2007/30, "the AGC stated in a media statement
that the ICJ does not It was not decided in favor of Malaysia on this point.In its decision, the ICJ nonetheless concluded, inter alia, that it did not consider the 1953 letter as having a constitutive character in that It had a conclusive legal effect on Johor, namely Pulau Batu Puteh, but rather as an answer to a Therefore, it is absolutely false to claim that Malaysia failed because Malaysia did not raise the question of the authority of the Acting Secretary of State of Johor
considering that the ICJ had not taken any decision about South Ledge (Tubir Selatan), the ICJ in its judgment of 2008 determined that sovereignty over South Ledge as low tide belongs to the 3 9 State in the territorial waters of w
"In accordance with its decision, Malaysia and Singapore have established a joint technical committee to implement the 2008 ruling," he added.
She stated that after the formation of the new Pakatan Harapan government after the 14th general election, and with Mohamed Apandi (the agent of Malaysia in the request for revision and application for interpretation ) on the garden leave, the case was the attention of Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad for instructions.
The AGC stated that one of the three international consultants and two local lawyers appointed by Mohamed Apandi were instructed to inform the Prime Minister about this in May 2018.
He stated that at the briefing, Dr. Brendan Plant, representing international consultants, maintained and reiterated the collective written opinions of international consultants dated January 2017.
"The two local lawyers, Datuk Abu Bakar As-Sidek Datuk Mohamad Sidek and Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin (who worked directly and closely with Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi) did not contradict Dr. Plant's opinion during the meeting. 39, information, the Prime Minister met with representatives of Chambers AG and Wisma Putra, said the AGC
after reviewing the views and other issues of national interest, including costs.
The decision was made by subsequently presented to the new cabinet at its first meeting on May 23, 2018, which she approved, "she added
" The decision, including its reasons, was also forwarded to the Sultan of Johor, His Majesty the Sultan Ibrahim ibn Almarhum Sultan Iskandar, "said the AGC.
He stated that the hearing dates for the review application and the request for interpretation were set by the ICJ from June 11 to 22, 2018.
The AGC indicated that she wished to point out that, in accordance with the usual practice of the ICJ, Malaysia has no objection to the written pleadings for the review application and the application for review. interpretation are made available to the public via the ICJ website. – Bernama
[ad_2]
Source link
