Hakam Condemns Investigation of Lawyer Fadiah for Sedition



[ad_1]

A human rights NGO says that this goes against Pakatan Harapan's promise to suppress repressive laws that restrict freedom of expression. PETALING JAYA: The National Society of Human Rights (Hakam) described the police investigation on the lawyer and activist Fadiah Nadwa Fikri as an example of blatant disregard for the spirit reforms adopted by the Pakistani government. Pakatan Harapan's current government

He noted that the lawyer had been called by the police under section 4 (1) of the 1948 Sedition Act and section 233 of the Communications. & Multimedia Act of 1998 for publishing an article online "Hakam strongly condemns the continued trust of the authorities and the enforcement of repressive laws, such as the Sedition Act 1948, and Secti 233 of the Communications & Multimedia Act 1998. [19659002] "These oppressive laws are arbitrary in nature.

"They restrict our freedom of expression frighteningly and do not belong in a democracy like Malaysia," Hakam said. Wei Jiet said in a statement on behalf of the Hakam Executive Committee

Hakam reminded authorities of Pakatan Harapan's manifesto for the 14th general election, including Promise No. 27, which clearly stated the commitment of the Government to revoke the 1948 Sedition Act and abolish the "draconian" provisions of the 1998 Communications and Multimedia Act.

The NGO said that several ministers had publicly expressed their opinion that the government would repeal these oppressive laws when Parliament was summoned.

that the authorities continue today to rely on such oppressive laws to investigate and monitor the lives of ordinary Malaysians, "he added.

the Government and the Chambers of Attorney General to impose a moratorium on any use of the Sedition Act 1948 and Article 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 – as well as other oppressive laws – until the end of the year. and that they be repealed by Parliament.

"Freedom of expression is a cherished constitutional right and the cornerstone of any democracy."

"Any question, even controversial and sacred must be open to discussion and criticism. "

" The Malays have long been threatened with retaliation in the past to simply speak their minds. "Our system of checks and balances, accountability and the rule of law has suffered greatly"

"Do not repeat such mistakes," added Lim.

Fadiah investigating an article that would have questioned the monarchy

The activist Pakatan Harapan allegedly challenged the existence of the monarchy, saying that she was outdated and that she could no longer be accepted or defended.

Fadiah also asks about the authorities' actions in inviting him to question despite the fact that the country practices democracy.

"They say it's a democracy but the authorities can not accept criticism and have taken away my right to speak.

"I do not try to be a hero, but I want us to be together.I'm not alone because I have friends.If we do not talk now, then when will we do it? "she asked.

I'm not alone, says lawyer seduced



[ad_2]
Source link