How high cost and fear prevented political finance reforms?



[ad_1]

PPBM strategist Wan Saiful Wan Jan says the elections are expensive and the previous government was vindictive towards potential supporters of Pakatan Harapan

Wan Saiful Wan Jan, PPBM strategist (center), surrounded by Economist Terence Gomez and political analyst Wong Chin Huat.

KUALA LUMPUR: Efforts to reform political financing have been stalled in the past because of the high cost of election campaigns and the vindictiveness of the previous government to potential donors, said today a former think tank become a politician. Umno's culture of victimization was also a potential cause of Pakatan Harapan's inability to meet some of his promises in his election manifesto, he said.

"If some promises are not achievable, I do not think it's our fault."

"There is an inheritance problem that we have to face and the real fault lies in the culture of victimization of Umno. "

Civil society groups have long urged Pakatan Harapan to Wan Saiful Wan Jan, a PPBM candidate in the general election, said he spent nearly RM200,000 on his campaign to be a member of parliament The cost included RM 50,000 on 5,000 T-shirts, RM 50,000 for party flags and RM 15,000 for renting five houses for its workers.

"It's still more expensive if you lose, especially in a rural area, "said Wan Saiful, who was beaten by the PAS candidate in Pendang.

He said that people in rural areas would also be approaching candidates for the job.

"Support is given continuously and not only During "Wan Saiful, now political secretary of the Minister of Education, Maszlee Malik, said that the previous administration would have gone after these," he said at a forum on "political finance reforms". who donated to Pakatan Harapan, who later formed the opposition.

Donors were therefore wary of revealing their identity. "If I reveal who my donors are, they could stop funding me," he said.

On several occasions, Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamad asserted that the BN administration, with the help of Inland Revenue his friends for making a donation to Pakatan Harapan

Civil society and several politicians had previously demanded that the identity of donors be revealed in the search for reforms.

Wan Saiful, former head of the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS), also lamented that a distribution culture was still prevalent, with people approaching politicians for the sake of democracy. 39, financial assistance.

Politicians were reluctant to change and be more transparent about funding because the company had not changed its attitudes. The manifesto of the PH is not a bible

Wan Saiful said that, as one of those who had drafted the manifesto of the PH, he wanted to see all the promises implemented.

He said that the manifesto should be changed light of the latest information and economic data available

A few days ago, Wan Saiful had acknowledged that some of the promises made had been populist in nature and had imputed insufficient data when drafting commitments.

"I would categorically deny that the problem was with us."

He also defended the recent remark of Pakatan Harapan's president, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, that the PH manifesto was not a bible but a guide, and he said that Mahathir was right

DAP: Unfair to accuse PH of not wanting to reform political financing

No U-turn on political and economic reforms, says PH [19659022] Wan Saiful admits that some PH promises are difficult to implement


[ad_2]
Source link