[ad_1]
Musa's lawyer, Tengku Fuad Tengku Ahmad, claims that the petition filed by the litigant, Zulkifli Kassim, was "fundamentally flawed, vexatious, frivolous and scandalous."
Musa Aman, by his lawyer, states that neither he nor any officer of Yayasan Sabah has been implicated in any breach of trust, let alone that involving RM 400 million. (Photo by Bernama)
KOTA KINABALU: The former chief minister of Sabah, Musa Aman, is being sued for RM 400 million by an individual and has 10 days from yesterday for appear before the High Court. Musa's lawyer, Tengku Fuad Tengku Ahmad, said that the plaintiff's petition, Zulkifli Kassim, was "fundamentally flawed, vexatious, frivolous and scandalous."
"This brief of two pages claims to claim 400 million RM in Tan Sri Musa, is clearly motivated by the simple politics and is designed to embarrass and scandalize my client.
" Other than that, it is devoid of content "
" Kota Kinabalu is a small town and everyone knows that my company acts for Musa
"So I wonder why the plaintiff chose to publish the writ in the newspaper as a substitute service?"
"Was it designed to simply humiliate my client?"
The plaintiff, Kampung Bobot, Kota Belud, had announced a legal noti
Tengku Fuad said that he further observed that the writ appeared to have been written by a lawyer, although it was not necessary. an indeterminate capacity
"Who are the hidden hands behind the plaintiff?"
The team, led by Tengku Fuad, will respond, according to the needs and instructions of Musa, to the respect of the judicial process "even if (the court) seems to have been abused by a vexatious plaintiff".
"It goes without saying that our client (Musa) completely denies the absurd allegations contained in the writ.
"He indefatigably states that neither he nor any of the Yayasan Sabah officers have been involved in a breach of trust, let alone one involving RM 400 million.
" Zulkifli's accusations are denied and we are instructed to defend and treat this writ in the proper manner, "said Tengku Fuad.
The court records indicate that the case was set before the High Court Judge Ravinthran Paramaguru. July 19 here
The opinions expressed in the content are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of FMT.
[ad_2]
Source link
