Najib withdraws complaint against AG, head of MACC, director of CCID on a 1MDB probe – BorneoPost Online | Borneo, Malaysia, Sarawak Daily News



[ad_1]

Datuk Seri Najib Razak Tun

KUALA LUMPUR: Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak withdrew his case against Attorney General Tommy Thomas, Chief Commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Datuk Seri Mohd Shukri Abdull and Bukit Datuk Seri Amar Singh Ishar Singh, director of the criminal investigations department of Aman, on investigations into 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).

Alice Loke Yee Ching, Senior Federal Counselor, Informed Journalists of the Withdrawal of the Trial Before Deputy Clerk Norhatini Abd Hamid

Loke, along with Federal Attorney General Suzana Atan, attended hearings yesterday , acting for Thomas, Mohd Shukri and Amar Singh, respondents.

Loke said the court authorized the withdrawal of the lawsuit for Najib

Najib Badrul's lawyer Hisham Abdullah, contacted by reporters, confirmed the withdrawal of Badrul Hisham said the complaint had was withdrawn because it had been filed before Najib was indicted in the High Court on 4 July for breach of trust and abuse of power on SRC International Sdn Bhd funds in the amount of RM 42 million. 19659003] The lawyer said that he would make adjustments to the lawsuit before submitting a new lawsuit following the current scenario after the charges were filed against Najib.

On June 30, Najib filed three original ex-parte summons (one side) separately, looking for a statement that the involvement of the three individuals in the probe in 1MDB was invalid and prejudicial. In his affidavit to support, Najib claimed that prior to the appointment of Thomas as Attorney General, he had written an article entitled "Grand Lacerny in 1MDB" in July 2016 concluded that the money deposited in the personal account of the former prime minister belonged to 1MDB

Najib claimed that by this article it was clear that Thomas did not like it and raised his concern that Thomas might find ways to Assure

In the lawsuit against Mohd Shukri, the former president of Umno claimed that Mohd Shukri, at a press conference on SRC International Sdn Bhd held shortly thereafter having been appointed chief commissioner of the MACC, had concluded that the prime minister received RM 42 million and RM 2.6 billion, even before he (Najib) was called upon to give his statements to the MACC.

"The press statement made by Mohd Shukri was vengeful and found me guilty of being guilty. </ P> <p> As such, the integrity and professionalism of his (Mohd Shukri) be disputed because it should remain neutral until the investigation is completed, but he chooses to punish without concrete evidence, "said Najib in his affidavit. also claimed that he would not benefit of a fair and transparent investigation and felt that with such an attitude, Mohd Shukri was not qualified to lead the MACC investigation team and to be a member of the group of 1MDB work set up by the Council of Eminent Persons.

In his original quote against Amar Singh, the MP for Pekan said the raid led by him and his team on his premises, including those resided by his children at Pavilion Residence and a loan by a friend to store arti his official residence in Seri Perdana did not comply with the normal operating procedure

The Claimant also claimed that Amar Singh was not qualified to be Special 1MDB Advisor in It. added that a police report had been filed against the three respondents, Thomas, Mohd Shukri and Amar Singh. – Bernama

What do you think of this story?

  • Angry ( 0% )

  • Sad ( 0% [19659020])

  • Nothing 0% )

  • Interesting ( 0% )

  • Large ( 0% )

[ad_2]
Source link