Questions on the Bukit Kukus landslide tragedy



[ad_1]

Bernama pic.

It is with great sadness that Penang Forum is issuing this press statement about the Bukit Kukus landslide tragedy. On Friday, Oct 19, innocent lives were lost. Workers who left their homes and families to make a living in our country, to build our roads under dangerous conditions, were buried in a landslide.

Shame on us if we care any less because they are not Malaysians. Shame on politicians who were quick to blame the rain and “inadequate” laws, and showed little to no remorse when so much could have been done to prevent this tragic loss of lives.

Over the last few days, the entire nation has read and heard shocking revelations with regards to the authorities’ appalling lack of ability to enforce existing laws and monitor construction sites.

A few highly alarming issues must be highlighted:

1. This is an MBPP project. Responsibility lies squarely and fully on its shoulders. Will it hold an independent and transparent commission of inquiry?

Hard questions must be asked. Was there an EIA for the project? Were the conditions followed? Were the safety guidelines of the state and MBPP followed? Who are the consultant engineers and checkers? Were they doing their job?

2. As mentioned in the press, laws requiring soil erosion mitigation works were not enforced and mitigation was not carried out by the contractors on this MBPP project. This includes the overflowing stream.

3. Just a week before the landslide, on Oct 13, a stop-work order was issued following a massive “site mishap” where 11 concrete columns, each measuring 25m long, fell from the very same elevated highway construction. Yet work continued undetected till DOSH called in the contractor on Oct 15. Work only ceased because of rain on the morning of Oct 19. The collapse occurred that very afternoon.

According to the press, the contractor said, “I was confused by the order.” He also claimed the dead and missing workers were not his. After the first mishap, did the authorities take concerted action to ensure the safety of the site?

4. Penang Forum and Penang Hills Watch alerted the authorities twice – first in January 2017 through photos and coordinates, and second in September with photos and satellite images – and urged for caution over the hill slope risks of the construction site at Bukit Kukus. Did the authorities take sufficient precautionary measures in a timely manner?

5. A year ago on Nov 21, 2017, after the tragic loss of 11 lives in the Granito Development hill slope collapse, MBPP was asked to ensure the safety of the construction at Bukit Kukus. The former mayor in a site visit declared Bukit Kukus was “safe”. Among the additional safety measures insisted upon was the construction of check dams, covering slopes with geotextile layers and increasing maintenance of the retention pond to remove sludge, by the hour if necessary. Were these measures ever put in place? Did MBPP monitor its own project?

6. Asking for new laws with higher fines, at this time, is clearly an attempt at distracting attention from the issue at hand. Are the authorities saying these workers died because we didn’t have enough laws? Did the authorities fail to implement and enforce the laws that we already have?

7. The authorities should now urgently focus on restoring damaged hill slopes and solving flooding issues. All development approvals have to take cognisance of global warming. They cannot say “yes” to hillside development and then blame the weather when a tragedy happens.

Penang Forum is not engaging in an “I told you so” exercise as misconstrued by the press. This would be counter-productive. Let us instead look at what Hong Kong did to rectify a poor record of construction site monitoring after a series of horrendous landslides.

The Hong Kong government set up a special Geotechnical Department in 1978 and staffed it with more than 200 professionals to carry out strict land risk management. In 2014, the Penang state government made an official visit to learn from them. MBPP then set up its own Geotechnical Consultancy Unit which is supposed to monitor all hillside developments. Was it adequately staffed? What was done or not done, and could the Granito and Bukit Kukus tragedies have been prevented?

Until such time as we have the capacity to manage hill land projects responsibly, professionally and adequately, the Penang government owes the people of Penang, at the minimum, the following:

Firstly, a moratorium on all ongoing hill land development, whether public or private sector projects, and a total ban on those which have not started.

Secondly, a total review of the three paired roads under the Zenith package and the Pan-Island Link with its highly dangerous tunnelling though fragile hills, massive use of explosives, precariously situated elevated sections with pylons and pillars, and most of all, its proximity to densely populated areas. An immediate introduction of traffic reduction strategies is necessary to obviate the need for additional roads in hill areas.

Issues of professional and statutory liability not only of private parties but also of government bodies must be determined. If there is negligence, the culprits must be charged. The endless pushing away of responsibility and blame must end with someone, or else it will be business as usual after the dust settles.

Penang Forum is an NGO that promotes such things as participatory local democracy and sustainable planning and development.

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.

[ad_2]
Source link