[ad_1]
Supporters of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry stand firm.
Days after a revealing interview between the two and Oprah Winfrey, in which the royal duo made allegations of racism and mistreatment against the royal family, Buckingham Palace’s response has failed to calm the controversy.
Observers have criticized the royal family for not openly condemning racism, but instead suggesting that Markle and Harry’s version of events may not be accurate.
In the interview, Markle, 39, claimed that at one point her husband was approached by a senior member of the facility to discuss the complexion of their then unborn child.
AUSTRALIAN MEP SUPPORTS TWEET MEGHAN MARKLE’S CLAIM MARRIED PRINCE HARRY TO BECOME QUEEN
In their statement released after the interview aired, Buckingham Palace said the family were “saddened” to learn of the couple’s struggles and noted that the race allegations were “concerning” but added that “some memories may vary “.
Nonetheless, the Palace said Markle and Harry’s comments are “taken very seriously and will be treated by the family in private”.
“Too little, too late” was the verdict of royal commentator Peter Hunt, who also voiced criticism of the family handling the case in private.
“This delayed and tame statement went for predictability when unpredictability – stepping outside of Windsor’s comfort zone – was what was needed,” Hunt wrote on the website of influential UK magazine The Spectator.
MEGHAN MARKLE’S FRIEND JANINA GAVANKAR SAYS OPRAH WINFREY EMAIL AND TEXT SUPPORT INTERVIEW CLAIMS
The interview with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex sparked conversations around the world about how issues like racism and mental health are handled within the monarchy.
Their frank discussion would have sparked crisis talks between the royal family and their close associates, but British monarchy historian Ed Owens said the pressure will remain on the family to publicly respond to Harry and Markle. have raised.
“There are big questions to be answered, and I think the press in both the UK, Europe and the US will continue to ask questions about the family relationship that exists between Harry and Meghan. and the Windsors in the UK, ”he said.
Additionally, Anna Whitelock, director of the Center for the Study of Modern Monarchy at Royal Holloway, University of London, said the palace’s brief message had “hardened the boundaries” between people who believe the monarchy is a stronghold. outdated of the privilege inherited from whites and those who consider it a cherished national institution.
QUEEN ELIZABETH IN PRIVATE QUIZ OF ROYAL SENIOR FAMILY MEMBERS AFTER MEGHAN’S CLAIMS HARRY’S RACISM: REPORT
Whitlock said the fallout from the interview could call into question the future of the monarchy itself, not only in the UK but also in countries where the Queen is head of state.
“This is a debate that has been held in check, in large part, given the length of the Queen’s reign and in regards to her and the role she played,” Whitelock said. “But it’s going to happen, and it’s just a matter of when, not if.”
The interview drew a massive global audience of nearly 50 million viewers, but divided those who watched.
Many people have backed Markle, saying the allegations demonstrate the need for change in an institution that has not kept pace with the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements. Others support the royal family, criticizing the couple for making their damning accusations at a time when Harry’s 99-year-old grandfather Prince Philip remains hospitalized in London after heart surgery.
Many blacks said Markle’s comments underscored the reality of racism in Britain, where the issue is too often referred to as an American problem.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Among them, Member of Parliament Bell Ribeiro-Addy said she was disappointed the royals were planning to deal with Markle’s allegations in private.
Likewise, she said she finds the palace’s lack of direct condemnation of racism disappointing and contradicts the palace’s swift action to investigate the intimidation allegations made against Markle by staff.
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER
“The monarchy is a public institution which receives public money and any criticism of the institution should really be greeted with a forceful response from the institution on what it is going to do,” Ribeiro-Addy told the BBC . “We expect (that) from any institution. Why not the monarchy, why not the palace?”
The Associated Press contributed to this report
[ad_2]
Source link