[ad_1]
Therefore, he is also quoted at the end of the introduction of the book: "I am ready to plead" for those who read the book to abandon veganism or vegetarianism they follow him and if not do not even think about following him.
If you are referring to Ivy Keith, his arguments have been answered since his book came out in 2009. It was simple because he did not provide any data to support his beliefs. of the type of vegan diet that followed for 20 years, neither one nor the other of his illnesses. https://t.co/sEwgiFbUge
– NoReirseDeRivera (@ 20axes) July 8, 2018
Between 1980 and 2000 Keith maintained his vegan diet; but after two years of wearing, he began to have very serious health problems. Derivative in a degenerative joint disease; with symptoms such as depression, exhaustion, removal of the ruler, skin so dry that it hurts to move your knees and elbows.
However the debate dictates Is it the fault of the vegan diet? Even the omnivorous diet could trigger illnesses, not any diet, including the vegan diet, while it's well-planned will not bring any complications. As the nutritionist Aitor Sánchez García talks about the current situation of diets based on vegetables.
The vegetarian myth is a good collection of churras and merinas.
Especially beginning with the equation of: "As agriculture impacts, vegetables are shocking."
We should start evaluating resources together: https: //t.co/aTzNa36erL– Aitor Sánchez García (@Midietacojea) 4 July 2018
However, veganism is directed beyond the diet because much of the ideology is based on an ethics that disapproves acts such as exploitation, death and consumption of non-human animals in all spheres of life: cosmetics and hygiene products and even clothing. As sums it well Ivy "The word vegetarian does not only define what you eat or what you believe in. It defines who it is, and it is a totalitarian identity."
[ad_2]
Source link