[ad_1]
The Shroud relic, which according to Catholic tradition was the shroud of Christ, has sparked controversy over the years, while for some, it has truly wrapped the body of Jesus, a year-long examination 1988 with carbon 14 that the canvas could have been created in the Middle Ages.
This week a new study was published on the Shroud of Turin that suggests that certain bloodstains would not be compatible with the position of a body, nor on the cross or in a grave
Anthropologists from the John Moores University, Liverpool, studied the blood of the Shroud of Turin and concluded that such marks could not have been left behind by a man who had been crucified.
published this week the Journal of Forensic Science is signed by the Forensic Anthropologist of the British John Moores University of Liverpool Matteo Borrini and the Chemist of the Italian University of Pavie Luigi Garla
The Study
The experts performed forensic techniques tests to determine whether the blood stains on the Shroud preserved in the Turin Cathedral correspond to those that would leave a body wrapped up after to have been crucified.
One of the experts, Garlachelli, volunteered to perform tests in which real and synthetic blood was used to pass through a catheter
. in the position where the trunk, arms and wrists should leave stains similar to those printed on the shroud and concluded that a part of the chest is consistent with "a subject standing with his arms at an angle of 39, about 45 degrees "
The experts show, however, their doubts about the traces left on the canvas by the wrists that do not correspond to any position of the body neither on the cross nor on the grave, assures
The same would occur with the marks left at the waist in the lumbar region, which would come from the blood coming out of the wound on the side after death and with the body already lying, which for the authors "Unreal"
In In this case, the researchers did tests with a manikin and explained, quoted by the Italian newspaper La Stampa, that the result was that the blood would not have reached the kidney area, but would have accumulated in the scapular region [19659002] Questions
The study, however, raised doubts of some experts on the Shroud, according to the Vatican Insider, La Stampa's religious information supplement, which consulted the deputy director of the International Center of Syndrology, the physicist Paolo di Lazzaro.
Among the noted problems is the presence of anticoagulants in the blood used for the study, so that "it has nothing to do with the crucified man in the the Holy Shroud (…), who has been tortured and dehydrated "so his blood should be more viscous than normal.
Another variable – he said – that was not taken into consideration was the state of the human skin wrapped in the shroud, because the study was made with all the clean skin of a person and a mannequin.
The Sindologue Emanuela Marinelli, quoted by Vatican News, has estimated that the study "has nothing scientific" and lacks rigor by the techniques used, such as the use of a model.
[ad_2]
Source link
