[ad_1]
This means that about 711 children are still in federal custody without the possibility of being delivered to their parents in the short term because they have already been deported or that he is very difficult to locate because they were released, but they do not know their exact location although many of them have electronic channels
The government is expected to reunite 2 thousand 551 separated children from their parents at the border. The deadline has been set for June 26 by Federal Judge Dana Sabraw of the Federal Court of Southern California in San Diego.
The court ordered 14 days to return children under 5 years and 30 days for those over 5 years.
The authorities have not given details on what they will do with the 711 children guarded by the government or how they will do it. reunite children with parents who have already been deported.
Among them, 120 children whose parents refused to meet them, 21 children whose parents had antecedents and 46 others whose parents had other problems in its history, according to government lawyers in a report filed in San Diego court.
In addition, there are 431 minors whose parents are not in the United States, the most likely reason being that they were deported. On Tuesday, two days before the deadline imposed by the judge, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) confirmed that 463 parents had been deported without their children and that the children were "staying in the United States". . [19659002] Finally, the government spoke of 94 cases in which it was still trying to determine the location of the parents.
LEGAL BATTLE
At the first reunification, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) only 58 of 103 children returned, triggering a wave of criticism inside and out outside the United States. On the eve of the end of the second term, fears and doubts were greater.
"We are very disappointed with the government. We knew that within the time frame set by the judge, the government would not comply with the figures, "said Lorella Praeli, director of the ACLU's migration policy
" and he did not did not provide any data to verify that the rallies correspond to the figures that the government says, "he added.
The ACLU demanded in June that the government put an end to separations of families at the border on the based on the case of the identified immigrant He left the Democratic Republic of Congo with his girl and arrived at the border between Mexico and California in November 2017.
NO RESPONSE [19659002] Praeli stated that the date of reunification of families, the number of parents deported without their children increased. "
He adds that" the ACLU does not know the exact number of parents who, according to the government, can not be reunited he there are no detailed explanations ".
ACLU also reveals the existence of serious disagreements with the Trump government, "because they want to expel the families quickly where there is a definitive order of expulsion, but we get there let us oppose, "says Praeli
" There are many people who have a last order of expulsion. because they do not know the system, they manipulated their rights, they made decisions without knowing what they signed, they did not understand the language, "says the director
KEY FAILURE
. problems, ACLU made an urgent appeal to the court last week so that the reunited families have at least seven days to find legal arguments "
" We believe that during this period, they will be able to contact lawyers to prepare their case and fight for their stay in the United States.
Among the options is the asylum, which the Trump government has restricted options in recent months.
On Thursday, the ACLU had information provided by the court, which in turn was sent by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a thousand 551 reunions.
"But, as we have said, we can not trust these data because they have not been verified," concluded Praeli
SCENARIOS
Professor Stephen Yale-Loehr, Faculty of Law of Cornell University, New York, analyzed the scenario after the completion of reunifications and identified three.
The first, that Sabraw J. may declare the government guilty of contempt, however, is not necessary. This would speed up the reunification process
Second, the Tribunal might believe in the government's response, that it is working quickly and in good faith and that it will have more time to reunite families.
that the Court may maintain its temporary order prohibiting the government from evicting families as soon as they meet. The response of the body will be known this Friday.
(At the request of AFP, Reformation and Univisión)
[ad_2]
Source link
