Fallo orders to vaccinate a girl against the human papillomavirus – News and protagonists

Family Judge Marcela Trillini admitted an appeal from the official ombudsman following the parents' refusal to apply the vaccine to the girl. He pointed out that the vaccination plan indicates a state prevention policy.

The judge of the family of this city, Marcela Trillini, admitted an appeal presented by the official mediator following the refusal to apply the vaccine against the human papillomavirus. (HPV) of a girl and the girl's parents. The judge warned in his decision that vaccination is mandatory to prevent the disease.
"It is imposed on the refusal of parents, the very personal right of the girl to enjoy the highest possible level of health, especially when she is not he warns about how this denial could benefit , stressing that the state should take positive steps to protect and promote health " said the judge in the ruling.
"The official vaccination plan prevention and its failure justifies judicial intervention for the defense of the right to individual and collective health" concluded Trillini.
The ombudsman intervened in the case of a note presented by the director of the Ramon Carrillo Hospital, who accompanied the rejection form signed by the mother of the girl.
Trillini recalled in the sentence, which aired the press area Monday afternoon. the Judiciary, that Article 11 of Law 22909 provides: "The vaccinations mentioned in this law are binding on all inhabitants of the country, those who must submit to them according to what the law does. authority determines "Parents, guardians, guardians and guardians of minors or incapable persons are responsible to their dependents for compliance with the provisions of paragraph 2 above …" warned the judge.
He noted that, as is evident from the national calendar, the HPV vaccine is mandatory. He pointed out that "The Forensic Investigation Corps points out that human papillomaviruses are a group of over 200 related viruses, many of which can be easily transmitted. "Persistent infections with high-risk HPV types can mutate into cellular changes that, if left untreated, can progress to cancer" warned Trillini
in the decision that refusal to receive the vaccine exposes the girl to serious risk and to other people with whom she interacts in the educational and social field.
She claimed that parents are the first to ensure the right to psychophysical health of their children. In the release of the Judiciary they emphasized the decision of "the enormous importance gained by the right to health of children and adolescents in our country, which allows the state to intervene in the pursuit of compliance with these obligations "
" Vaccination not only reaches the individual who receives it, but it also exceeds that personal sphere to have a direct impact on health public, one of its main objectives being to reduce and / or eradicate infections in the population " claimed Trillini citing the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court."
"And only so can be understood the obligatory and coercive nature of the scheme for all the inhabitants of the country which is based on reasons of collective interest which do to the general well-being " added Trillini.