Prohibit killing dogs for eating in South Korea



[ad_1]

Mexico City – On Thursday, a court in South Korea ruled that killing dogs for food was illegal, which is a very positive first step for those who are demanding a national ban on dog meat.

South China Morning Post, the decision comes from a court in Bucheon, a city just 12 miles from Seoul, the Korean capital. A group fighting for animal rights called Care, presented the case against a local operator of a dog farm that they found during a secret operation. The court ruled that the consumption of meat was not a legal reason to kill dogs, and the official was fined 3 million won (53 thousand 800 pesos).

"It's very important because it's the first decision not to kill the dogs to eat taken by the court," said Kim Kyung-eun, a healthcare lawyer, at the SCMP [19659002] The practice of killing dogs and slaughtering them for meat has been part of South Korean cuisine for a long time, with about 1 million dogs eaten each year, but, recently, the consumption of dog meat has decreased by significantly, since more Koreans have adopted dogs as pets instead of eating them.

"In recent decades, public discourse on dog meat consumption has shifted to focus on the ban ", said So-youn leader Care Park." The canine meat industry will have more pressure because of the court ruling. "

However, a survey found that while 70 percent of the South -Coreans do not consume meat e dog, only 40 percent believe that the practice should be banned. After the decision, furious farmers came out to protest against Bucheon's court decision, citing the double cultural standard as their objection.

Cho Hwan-ro, a representative of a canine farm association, said that farmers, whose facilities generally function as slaughterhouses, should not accept the decision on a whim. Instead, Cho asked the Korean government to legalize the consumption of dog meat and to directly allow dog slaughterhouses. "Dogs to eat and dogs as pets must be separated," he said. In the 170,000 dog farms across the country, humans are of different races, feed differently and are raised for different purposes. "Cows, pigs, chickens and ducks are bred to be eaten and why are dogs not?"

However, Cho's views do not seem to be shared by the South Korean legislature. Just last week, the ruling Democratic Party in South Korea introduced legislation that would end dog meat production in South Korea forever. The bill would limit the slaughter of animals to those considered "cattle", dogs not belonging to this group.

@

The comments made in the section above are the responsibility of the participants. Help us maintain a healthy exchange of ideas by denouncing, by means of an icon on the flag, each participation that you consider inappropriate. If the comment does not conform to THE RULES it will be eliminated. See here the regulation .

Welcome to our comments service. We invite you to analyze, comment on and question the articles and reports published by El Diario. To maintain a healthy exchange of ideas for all our users, it is necessary that you follow the rules that we detail below. By participating in the commenting service, you agree to the application of these rules.

You agree that you are solely responsible for the content you post.

Will not intentionally post content that violates any copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property of any third party.

Will not disseminate defamatory, obscene or aggressive content that violates the right of a third party to privacy under municipal, state, federal or even international laws or that is considered inappropriate. It will indemnify Paso del Norte Publications (*), its employees and affiliates for all claims and / or dats (including, but not limited to, attorney fees) that are submitted by third parties in relation to the content you have published. It will not write discriminatory content to other people because of their gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, sexual preference, disability or any other category.

You understand and agree that El Diario is not responsible for the content published by third parties.
It is understood that in the discussion forums, El Diario monitors the published content and reserves the right to delete, edit or modify content that appears inappropriate for any reason without seeking the consent of the author. We reserve the right, by our own criteria, to remove a user's right to post content on our site.

Understand and agree that discussion forums should be used for non-commercial purposes.
He will not ask for economic resources or support. It will not promote commercial companies or carry out commercial activities of any kind in our discussion forums.

You understand and agree that the use of any information obtained through the discussion forums is at your own risk.
The Journal does not endorse the content that users broadcast, and can not and will not be responsible for its accuracy.

With all the content that you publish, you grant to El Diario without royalties the irrevocable license, perpetual, exclusive and totally under license to use, to reproduce, to modify, to adapt, to publish, to translate, to create works derived from, distribute, perform and display such content in its entirety or parts worldwide and incorporate them into their work anyway currently known or developed thereafter.

[ad_2]
Source link