[ad_1]
The 2018 World Cup in Russia has already lost three of the big favorites. Argentina, Spain and Portugal remained in the round of 16. The big surprise was the fall of the Iberian team against the Russians, who, with a strong defense, brought the match to penalties, with which they finally won.
Do you lose or win the World Cup with the elimination of these powers? This was the question discussed in THE TIME of the Final Debate a program broadcast by Fox Sports.
For Hernán Peláez, a regular production analyst, these teams leave the World Cup for reasons they are not unfair. In his analysis, he assured that no one would say that it is unfortunate that Spain and Argentina are no longer at the World Cup because of the show and the good game.
"Nobody will miss Spain, he did a multi-pass exercise, but he did not generate chances," he said of the match against Russia, where the Iberians led by Fernando Hierro accumulated 75% of the ball possession
. Defeated from this tournament is the League of Spain, because not only has their selection been eliminated, but the standards and stars have gone, like the Argentine Lionel Messi, of Barcelona, having lost with France ; Cristiano Ronaldo, of Real Madrid, was eliminated by Uruguay in a good match against Portugal, and the German Toni Kroos could not avoid the poor performance of his team, which n & # 39; 39, did not go beyond the group stage.
On the poor performance of Spain against Russia, Ivan Rene Valenciano, exfutbolista who is now an analyst at Fox Sports, said of Russia that the Iberians were a [traduction] "timid team", arguing that he "was not doing it had to do" and, therefore, could not violate the hosts of this World Cup.
Darío Ángel Rodríguez, moderator of the debate, joined these opinions and considered that Spain has never deepened, but applauded the way He defended Russia and showed himself as a compact team.
At this discussion, Rodriguez put on the table the fault committed by Julen Lopetegui, who was sacked as coach of Spain two days before the team's debut. That was the person who knew the operation and knew how the game system was installed. "Fernando Hierro began to invent, he did not put Andrés Iniesta."
Lopetegui's lack of selection was also analyzed by Luis Fernando Suárez, La Equidad coach and analyst at the final El Tiempo del Debate, who felt that his technical line hand could have changed the history of this team, which showed he did not know how to solve the problems posed by Russia and turned his game into a lot of passes inconsistent.
Hierro's tactics rested on the indication to the players that it was "doing what they can," which is very complicated, said the reporter. coach of the Bogota team
In the decisive stages of the World Cup, Suárez said: "The World Cup generates good expectations as to how the teams evolve. Today is the time of the boys 'rebellion, there could be an unprecedented champion, and that could be attractive to people. "
Today is the time of the boys' rebellion; could have an unprecedented champion, and this may be loving people
Another who delved into the problems of Spain's technical bank was Óscar Córdoba, who expressed his opinion of Russia. For the exporter of the Colombian national team, Fernando Hierro had no credibility among the players; In addition, it was seen that Lopetegui had a plan, but leaving it was noticed that the Spaniards lacked an idea.
The technician's change improvisation was extended by José Orlando Ascencio, EL TIEMPO's Sports Editor, He went undefeated from the World Cup and added that Hierro, maybe, n & # 39 was not the character that a selection like you needed in a decisive case.
"Hierro had no character; the Spaniards might need some more motivating. They threw him a hot potato after the release of Lopetegui", emphasized Ascencio.
Darío Ángel Rodríguez supplemented the idea by saying that Luis Rubiales, president of the Royal Spanish Football Federation, was responsible for this surprise fall when he stopped Lopetegui after learning that he had everything organized to go to Real Madrid, "I lost a whole country."
On the same discussion, Hernán Peláez added that it hurts as teams like France and Uruguay leave, but Spain and Argentina have not shown anything.
Regarding the Lopetegui issue, he said that we did not know what would have happened; however, it was emphatic that "the coach is not the one who plays, let's not kid ourselves."
One of the actions discussed among panelists of the debate was the criminal claim by Spain players during the extension. Ascencio stated that the referee Bjorn Kuipers did not resort to the VAR when there was a clash against Sergio Ramos, a game that could be called a penalty.
Several of the analysts said that there were criminals and critics that the Bjorn Kuipers were not using the system.
For its part, Óscar Córdoba said that "if you whistle this action, you drop the tribune above. This is a normal touch on the field.
In addition, said Córdoba, the one who has the most handsome hand of Russia was Spain itself, which showed football lack of depth.
Following the Elimination of Spain by Russia, the host team will face Croatia.The team led by Luka Modric begins as a favorite of this quarter-final key, which is decided on Saturday at Fisht Stadium in Sochi, one of the semi-finalists of the 2018 World Cup.
FINAL DEBATE
[ad_2]
Source link
