The defense of 'El Chapo & # 39; alleges that there is no fair trial conditions



[ad_1]

The defense of 'El Chapo & # 39; alleges that there is no fair trial conditions

NEW YORK.

The defense of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán Loera reiterated in a new document submitted to the Federal Court that executes the proceedings against him and published today that there was no condition for that his client has a fair trial.

The motion was sent to Judge Brian Cogan, who is presiding over the case, in response to the Prosecutor's refusal to remove some of the evidence submitted shortly before the start of the trial, as requested by the defense last Friday.

According to El Chapo's lawyers, they ask Brian to accept his request, with the amount of information received one month before the start of the trial, on November 5, 14,000 pages and of which 3,500 in English. , which must be translated so that Guzman can read them, they will not have the time to evaluate them and to investigate to prepare a fair defense of their client.

"What the government does not understand is that Guzmán has the right to revise these documents, which he can not do without the help of the defense because he do not read English, "they warn.

In the document, in which they accuse the Office of the Prosecutor of making fun of the defense, it is stated that, although it is true that the government informed them that they would communicate more information, "knowing what would be produced and having it otherwise."

They also objected that the prosecutor's office allegedly duplicated, shortly before the trial, the list of alleged victims of the conspiracy to assassinate them, in which Guzmán allegedly participated as leader of the Sinaloa cartel.

"You can see the train arrive while you're on the road, but you can not feel it as long as it does not hit you," says document handed by Eduardo Balarezo, one of his lawyers , which insists that the legal procedure is violated. law

He claims that the sending of evidence and the list of alleged new victims may be consistent with the responsibilities of the Office of the Prosecutor. However, "this is not consistent with what the Constitution guarantees for due process," said Balarezo, who adds that there is an argument that "ignores" the government.

He also argues that the Constitution does not provide sufficient room for due process based on the identity of the accused or the allegations made against him.

Guzmán, extradited from Mexico, faces eleven charges – there were 17 initially – for which he will be tried from 5 November, when jury selection will begin for a proceeding that may last three or three years. four months because of its complexity.

They disguise themselves as "El Chapo & # 39; and are arrested in Culiacán, Sinaloa.

[ad_2]
Source link