Trump vs. Trump: 6 contradictory versions of the president on Russia in less than 10 days



[ad_1]

This Donald Trump contradicts himself and offers different versions on almost any subject, this is not exactly a novelty. But in the case of Russia's intervention in the 2016 US elections, the president could break a record with diametrically opposed versions on the same subject in a few days.

One of the most recent and most surprising was the one the president gave in a tweet: that the Russians will actually interfere in the mid-term elections of November ] (after denying it a few days ago, even though intelligence agencies warn it month), but to help Democrats, a comment that many see as a first blow to confidence in the electoral process in November next.

These days, we listened to the President Invite Putin to Washington, then go down again; to say that the Russians did not intervene, to say then yes … and then say no today, but yes to favor the Democrats. This is a review of these and other Trump vs. Trump contradictions of the last 10 days.

July 25: Trump invites and disinvites Putin in Washington

Many voices have commented that it was not the right time. to invite the United States to Putin, the man that the US secret services say to be responsible for the interference in the 2016 presidential elections.

Only 6 days later, maybe because of pressure and negative repercussions The invitation, The White House was overthrown

On Wednesday, Trump National Security Advisor, John Bolton, said: "The President believes that the next bilateral meeting with President Putin should take place after the Russian witch hunt, we agreed that it would be after the first day of the year. "

Trump-like, Bolton called the work of Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller, who has already presented There are dozens of formal charges, such as a "witch hunt". It is unclear why Bolton considers that the investigation will end before 2019, as there is no strict deadline for Mueller to complete his work.

For many, it is striking to say that Rusiagate "to back down in the invitation to Putin because the previous summit in Helsinki on July 16 also the investigation was ongoing and it was Trump himself who led the event. [249494] July 24: The Russians will help the Democrats

Ok, now the President agrees that the Russian interference is continuing.But he assures that they will seek to intervene in the November elections but to help the Democrats.

"I am very concerned that Russia will fight very hard to have an impact on the Elections to come, because no president has been harder with Russia than me, they will be pushing for Democrats. They absolutely do not want Trump! ", Tweety the President

<iframe srcdoc ="


] "class =" _ 3ndsl "title =" socialEmbed-twitter "height =" 320 ">

Trump told many times that the Russians did not mind in elections.He also said, contrary to what the US intelligence agencies have informed him, that this could be Russia or anyway. What other country.

But now, a few months after a bitter election that may change majorities in Congress and Reconfigure Washington for the next few years, Trump says they'll step in, but in favor of Democrats. , again, contradicts the US intelligence agencies, who reiterated that the Russians intervened to tip the 2016 elections in favor of Trump. [19juillet1989] July 19: "The incredible offer" does not make any difference. was not so

] Putin offered to authorize US investigators interrogate Russians accused in Moscow in exchange for the US allowing the Kremlin to question US citizens about alleged interference in unspecified Russian cases. Trump called Putin's idea Monday "an incredible offer."

Such a statement went unnoticed. Until White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said that Trump would "work with his team" to evaluate instead of simply rejecting it. Russian offer

. That Russia is questioning US officials, including the former US ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, has sparked indignation between Republicans and Democrats.

The rejection was so unanimous, that there was overwhelming unanimous vote in the Senate to approve a resolution called for by the leader of the Democratic minority, Chuck Shcumer, who asserts that the executive power can not make current or former US officials available to Russia for questioning.

negative, still the White House retreated and said the president would not accept Putin's offer.

"This is a proposal made with President Putin's Innocence, but President Trump is not in agreement (…) We hope that President Putin will bring the 12 Russians identified in the United States to prove their innocence or guilt, "Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. 19659004] July 18: The White House corrects Trump

In the White House, Trump was in front of reporters who questioned him on several issues on July 17. One of the questions was whether he thought Moscow was destined to intervene in the democratic process of the United States.

The next day he had to rectify Huckabee Sanders, who said: "The president was saying" No "Answering the questions", not the question itself

A few days ago, the director National Intelligence, Dan Coats, had warned against the cyberattacks growing against the US to the point of saying that he had reached a "critical point." "The warning signs are there, the system falters" , says Coats.

After Trump's lukewarm not to have condemned Putin for his intervention and the subsequent contradictions of the president, Coats insisted in a statement that US intelligence experts were very clear about their findings which Russia intervened in the 2016 elections and on the ongoing efforts to do it again.

July 17: Trump says he meant something else

was with Vladimir Pout by his side at the Helsinki conference, Trump said that he did not see why "Russia would have been involved " in the interference of the Presidential Election of 2016

The 45-minute conference in Finland was violently criticized by both Republicans and Democrats and the President tried to change at least a little the weak position that he had posted against Putin.

Then, on July 17 at the White House, he says that he meant that he did not see why "Russia would not have been involved" [19659002] "I said" I would have been "in instead of" I would not have been, "explained Trump." The sentence should have been, " no I do not see why it is not Russia. "

July 16: Trump believes Putin (more than his own community of intelligence) [19659005] This Monday was the day of Trump's controversial meeting with Putin that triggered the series of corrections we will see in the following days.

Except for the president himself and his entourage, the presentation provoked criticism in virtually every political sphere. Washington

The most controversial of these 45 minutes was how elusive Trump in his view somehow to Putin, the man behind the cyberat cries to the Democratic Party and other democratic institutions in the United States in 2016. As well as the invasion of Crimea in 2014.

It also aroused outrage that Trump said that Putin was "Very convincing" in his refusal of election interference, rather than stating firmly that his confidence was on the side of US intelligence. idence and not the Russian president.

"There was no collusion, everyone knows it," Trump said. " President Putin was extremely firm and convincing in his refusal today ."

Trump went on to say that despite "great confidence" in US intelligence, Putin had shown "very convinced" when he denied the interference.

Neither the US Senate nor the intelligence community of his country, which, on the basis of evidence and investigation, ensure that the Kremlin was behind the hacking also seemed " convincing "to Trump that Putin's refusal.

To conclude, Trump once again had time to praise the Russian president. He called it "a good competitor" and said it was "a compliment".

In photos: The private meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump in Helsinki

  Loading

Loading the gallery

[ad_2]
Source link