Michael Wolff publishes the sequel to "Fire and Fury" describing Trump as "more and more volatile"



[ad_1]

Author Michael Wolff will release in June an explosive sequel to his controversial book "Fire and Fury" which President Trump strongly criticized after its release in 2018.

The book, entitled "Siege: Trump Under Fire", will present the administration as "under fire from almost all sides". "Siege reveals an administration perpetually beset by investigations and a president increasingly volatile, erratic and exposed," said the book's publisher on his website.

With the release date of June 4, "Siege" will probably pour gasoline on a fire that is already raging and engulfing the investigation on Russia. According to Axios, the book ends with the publication of the report of the special advocate Robert Mueller, a bomb that provoked an additional democratic inquiry and that appears to have prompted the Justice Department to investigate the origins of the Russian investigation.

TRUMP ASKS AN EDITOR TO STOP THE PUBLICATION OF A BOOK AT THE ORIGIN OF BANNON FALLOUT

Wolff's first book also triggered a media storm as it included negative claims about the president and his family that some members of the government were questioning his mental health and that the former senior advisor Trump, Steve Bannon, made fun of Don Jr. and Jared Kushner.

At the time, Sarah Sanders, press secretary for Trump and the White House, criticized the book, describing it as a "total fantasy" and a "work of fiction".

LIBERAL MEDIA REFLECTING THE "DISAGREEMENT" AUTHOR ANTITRUMP, MICHAEL WOLFF

"I never talked to him about a book," tweeted Trump. "Full of lies, false statements and non-existent sources."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Wolff apparently would not have sought an interview with Trump for "Siege" but, according to his publisher, would have interviewed 150 sources or his book. Many of these publications included essential sources from Wolff's first book.

"Fire and Fury" has been criticized for its sourcing and claims. For example, New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman said the book contained lies. "Light, checking and reviewing the facts," she said at the time. Washington Post reporter Aaron Blake said part of Wolff's book was "unbelievable" and criticized him for not quoting sources while treating gossip as fact.

[ad_2]

Source link