[ad_1]
Fox News declined to broadcast the first hour of the Democratic National Convention in its entirety Monday night, opting instead for Sean Hannity interviewing Donald Trump Jr. Network commentators spoke for much of the second hour. But when it comes to former first lady Michelle Obama’s speech, they couldn’t make a single criticism.
“It’s very difficult to try to connect with an audience without an actual audience with you, but she has the ability to connect with people across the screen,” began Dana Perino, former George W press secretary. Bush. “When you talk about authenticity, she has it in spades. She’s got that voice, she’s got clarity, and she knows what she wants to do. She was trying to get everyone to really focus, and then she made a call to action: ask for your ballot tonight. I think the DNC, if they watch overnight, the first virtual convention in our history, they would say Michelle Obama blocked the landing.
“I agree with Dana,” Chris Wallace said. “Michelle Obama, as she said, doesn’t like politics and she said this speech was her main contribution to the Biden campaign. It was a hell of a contribution. She really skinned, sliced, and diced Donald Trump, talking about the chaos and confusion and lack of empathy, especially from this president and this White House.
“It was a very effective speech,” he added.
According to Juan Williams, Michelle Obama “outperformed” her famous “when they go low, we go high” speech at the 2016 convention. “I heard it like a son,” he says. “I thought she spoke like a mother, like a stern mother, like a tiger mother told you, it’s important. This is something that is important to our family. This is who we are in this family. This is our identity. We have empathy. We understand compassion. “
“I’m surprised how much I felt it,” Williams continued. “I really thought there was a great speech.”
Anchor Bret Baier, who rarely makes his own views known, credited Democrats for “doing their best on the first night.”
Even the deeply conservative commentator Brit Hume admitted that Obama was “very good” and his speech was “effective”, although he accused him of including “distortions and exaggerations” in his speech, adding: ” but that’s what we expect in political rhetoric. ”
“The question, then, is not the actual veracity of the case being presented, but how effectively it is delivered and whether the attacks are likely to have the effect on the electorate it hopes for,” said Hume. “I suspect that in this case it probably is.
[ad_2]
Source link