MLB 2019 Project – First round pick, order, live updates and analysis



[ad_1]

The draft MLB 2019 starts Monday (7 pm ET) with turns 1-2 and continues until June 5th (rounds 3 to 10 on June 4th and rounds 11 to 40 on June 5th).

Adley Rutschman first ranked first at the Baltimore Orioles, followed by the Kansas City Royals and the Chicago White Sox.

Come back for analysis of all the choices of the first round and more.

Full coverage of the draft MLB 2019 is available here and click here to complete the preliminary order of the 2019 series from series 1 to 40.

More from Keith Law:Initiated Top 100 |Initiated Mock draft 3.0

1. Baltimore Orioles: Adley Rutschman, C, State of Oregon

Who is Rutschman? The No. 1 prospect in this draft class and a sure bet to remain at the receiver, Rutschman hit .408 for Oregon State this year. According to Keith Law, the backstop hitting the switch has one of the safest stages in the repechage, as it will remain behind the plate and ceiling of a long-lasting All-Star thanks to its power potential.

Why did the Orioles bring him here: It's no secret, the Orioles have holes to fill up all over the diamond and throw at the back of the plateau the potential of a cornerstone of the franchise that made comparisons with Buster Posey and Joe Mauer is a very good starting point. How is Rutschman? Well, Cincinnati showed the ultimate sign of respect in choosing to walk with the bases charged during a regional game in the NCAA last week. – Dan Mullen


2. Kansas City Royals: Bobby Witt Jr., SS, Colleyville, Texas Heritage HS

Who is Witt? The most famous name in this year's class is undoubtedly the father of Witt, third choice of the 1985 test, making Witts the first father-son couple to figure in the top five. The star of preparation in Texas is a real stopover with a potentially more defense, a huge arm, a good instinct and a history of blows.

Why the Royals took him here: According to Keith Law, the Royals focused on Witt a few months ago and did not hesitate to make it their second-best guy. The advantage of Kansas City is to bet on a star in the middle of the diamond, but there is a reason for his concern about the age of Witt (he will be 19 in June) for a high school student since he He is older than most of the competitors he has faced up to now. – Mullen


3. Chicago White Sox: Andrew Vaughn, 1B, Cal

Who is Vaughn? Vaughn, the winner of the Golden Spikes in 2018, has absolutely won since he arrived at the Berkeley campus. He followed his batting average of .402 in 2018, reaching .381 this year and scored 50 homers in three seasons at Cal.

Why the White Sox brought him here: Keith Law has described Vaughn as the best pure bat in this draft and it would have been hard to imagine a Chicago defeat adding this type of hitter with choice number three. Vaughn, who plays a major role in the world of conferences, should move quickly from one stage to another in the ranks of miners and bring his turn smoothly to the right of the south side at the earliest. The story of the first shorter basic players as a high draft pick is not extraordinary, but Vaughn has a chance to change that here. – Mullen


4. Miami Marlins: J. J. Bleday, OF, Vanderbilt

Who is Bleday? Bleday is a future defensive player with an unusual strike that could present some risks, but enough power to make it more than profitable.

Why did the Marlins bring him here: A fine university bat is perfect for a franchise that desperately needs to be offended at the big league level. Miami attracted sports players during Derek Jeter's brief tenure, but betting on a prospect of the first stick shows a willingness to go out of the mold for the right player – Mullen


5. Strait Tigers: Riley Greene, OF, HS Hagerty (Oviedo, Florida)


6. San Diego Padres


7. Cincinnati Reds


8. Texas Rangers


9. Atlanta Braves


10. San Francisco Giants


11. Toronto Blue Jays


12. New York Mets


13. Minnesota Twins


14. Phillies of Philadelphia


15. Los Angeles Angels


16. Diamondbacks from Arizona


17. Washington nationals


18. Pirates of Pittsburgh


19. Cardinals of St. Louis


20. Seattle Mariners


21. Atlanta Braves


22. Rays of Tampa Bay


23. Colorado Rockies


24. Cleveland Indians


25. Los Angeles Dodgers


26. Diamondbacks from Arizona


27. Chicago Cubs


28. Milwaukee brewers


29. Oakland Athletics


30. New York Yankees


31. Los Angeles Dodgers


32. Houston Astros


Choice of compensation

No. 33: Diamondbacks from Arizona: *
No. 34: Arizona Diamondbacks: **

* To lose Patrick Corbin
** To lose A.J. Goberge


Competitive balance A

# 35 Miami Marlins:
No. 36 Rays of Tampa Bay: *
# 37 Pirates of Pittsburgh:
No. 38 New York Yankees: **
No 39 Minnesota Twins:
No. 40 Rays of Tampa Bay: ***
No. 41 Texas Rangers: ****

* Not to sign Gunnar Hoglund
** Red via the trade
*** From A via commerce
**** Brewers via the trade


Second turn

No. 42 Baltimore Orioles:
No 43 Boston Red Sox: *
No. 44 Kansas City Royals:
# 45 Chicago White Sox:
No. 46 Miami Marlins:
No. 47 Detroit Tigers:
No. 48 San Diego Padres:
No. 49 Cincinnati Reds:
No. 50 Texas Rangers:
No. 51 Giants of San Francisco:
No. 52 Toronto Blue Jays:
No. 53 New York Mets:
No. 54 Minnesota Twins:
No.55 Los Angeles Angels:
No. 56 Arizona Diamondbacks:
# 57 Pirates of Pittsburgh:
No. 58 Cardinals of St. Louis:
No. 59 Seattle Mariners:
No. 60 Atlanta Braves:
No. 61 Rays of Tampa Bay:
No. 62 Colorado Rockies:
No. 63 Cleveland Indians:
No. 64 Chicago Cubs:
# 65 Milwaukee brewers:
# 66 Athletics Oakland:
N ° 68 Houston Astros:
N ° 69 Boston Red Sox: *

* Boston's top pick was eliminated from 10 places (33 to 43) because the team had more than $ 40 million more than the luxury tax.


Competitive balance sheet B

No. 70 Kansas City Royals:
No. 71 Baltimore Orioles:
No. 72 Pittsburgh Pirates:
No. 73 San Diego Padres:
No. 74 Arizona Diamondbacks:
No. 75 Arizona Diamondbacks: *
Seattle Mariners: **
No. 77 Colorado Rockies:

* Cardinals via the trade
** Indians via the trade


Choice of compensation

No. 78 Los Angeles Dodgers: *

* For losing Yasmani Grandal


Here is the command for rounds 3-40.

[ad_2]

Source link