MLB Project: Scott Boras wants a restructured selection process that encourages winning



[ad_1]

With Major League Baseball Player Retrieval about to start (Monday at 7 pm), it is the time of year when people suggest ways to improve it. Most of the proposals call for one or two tame pinches, with some daring souls asking baseball to abolish the draft and make all eligible players free agents. Agent Scott Boras is between. On Monday, he picked up some of his ideas, pointing out that baseball was a problem.

As reported by Michael Silverman of the Boston HeraldBoras believes that baseball should not reward teams that lose. Boras would rather see the restructured baseball the way the repechage selections are dealt, prompting the teams to try – even when the playoff spot is out of the question.

"How to solve this problem is simple: if you do not win 72 games, or if you do not win the top 5, if you do not win 70 games or more, your draft status is outside the top 10. you are not competitive, you can not participate in the repechage, you must earn a certain level of games each year to obtain the required positioning in the repechage that your club would normally have to acquire.If you do not win the number of required games., you fall outside the top five or the top ten. "

This is part of Boras' proposal. He would also like low-income clubs to get additional choices to win their division – again, to encourage teams to form the best club possible. You will need to click to view some of his other ideas and comments on the draft.

As this is Boras, some will give him their suggestions without further consideration – recalling his intention to generate as many pretenders as possible for his clients. And while this reflection probably has merit, it also has merit in what it says.

Developing for draft selections is a strategy that is perfect for everyone involved, with the exception of fans. CEOs who do so receive years and years of job security without having to show results in the field. Meanwhile, homeowners can spend less money on big league products – without worrying about having to spend arms and legs on amateur players, because bonus caps have done the work for them.

Fans, on the other hand, must spend years of bad baseball to reap the benefits. As freelance writer Marc Normandin has said in his latest worker-focused news bulletin:

This focus on the low price, the added value on the needs, has hurt the product in the field, which affects the attendance and the interest, which is terrible for the long-term health of the MLB. The project serves only one master, and it is the homeowners' wallet: all the damage it causes is expected and collateral for these types, and it is a short and long-term problem to be solved for those who are not.

What Boras is proposing – ensuring that teams win a minimum of games to receive their valuable draft pick – would not necessarily solve the current problems. This could, however, prevent baseball from having four teams on the pace for 100 losses on the day of the repechage. And if that increases the value of a marginal victory – and the number of teams competing for free agents eliminated by Mr. Boras – then so be it.

[ad_2]

Source link