[ad_1]
MSNBC star Rachel Maddow has appeared very dismissive of the latest indictment in Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation.
While the liberal TV host avoided covering Thursday’s official indictment, she addressed a New York Times report on Wednesday that foresaw the legal issues facing Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who has been accused of having lied to the FBI for not disclosing his links to the Clinton campaign after pushing for an investigation into then-candidate Donald Trump’s ties to Russia in 2016, particularly his ties to Kremlin-linked Alfa Bank , presented as harmful.
Maddow, who previously defended the Russian collusion narrative during the Mueller investigation, promoted the so-called “mystery” of “unusual communication” between the bank and a server belonging to the Trump Organization in his 2018 program.
CAMPAIGN CLINTON LAWYER MICHAEL SUSSMANN CHARGED FOR LYING TO FBI DURING RUSSIAN INQUIRY
“The significance of this story from the very beginning was basically that no one knew what it meant! No one knew what it was!” Maddow laughed Wednesday. “I mean, even the title of that first Slate story was published as a question. “Was a Trump server communicating with Russia? It’s hard to say, but it seemed like there was something strange there. There was something unexplained and strange about the data. “
While the MSNBC host has now admitted that the results could have been “benign” or “really nothing,” she pointed to the “experts” who at the time sounded the alarm bells at the particular sightings.
Maddow then scoffed at the “odd” suggestion that the Alfa Bank narrative was “fabricated” and a “product of a conspiracy theory orchestrated by the Clinton campaign and the Democrats and the” Deep State “to trap Donald Trump, “which the bank has since alleged in the libel lawsuits.
“And Trump’s Justice Department seems to have sort of worked out with that,” Maddow smirked.
She went on to describe the Durham investigation as the only product of then-President Trump’s demands to support his claim that the Russia investigation was a “hoax.”
“You might not know it, you might not have even heard of the name John Durham if you don’t consume right-wing media regularly, but for the last two years of the Trump administration, the Fox News hosts and Right Wing Blogs and Republican lawmakers have consistently announced what the Durham inquiry will reveal, “Maddow said. “For years now, the Durham investigation has been this holy grail for Trump and his supporters, the thing that will finally expose the Russia investigation as some sort of crime against Trump that himself must be avenged.”
SLATE JOURNALIST SENT DRAFT STORY TO GPS FUSION ABOUT POSSIBLE TRUMP AND BANK OF RUSSIA RELATIONSHIP: INDICTATION
After reading much of the Times report on Sussmann’s indictment at the time, Maddow pointed out how this was a “strange development” for his viewers who appeared to defend Sussmann as that person concerned about the Trump-Russia findings and downplayed his apparent dishonesty regarding his work. for the Clinton campaign.
“So what this apparently leaves Durham with is a lawyer who gave the FBI information he thought they should have had. The FBI pursued this and decided, ‘eh, this is probably nothing. “And maybe this lawyer – there’s a question as to whether he fully disclosed who he represented at the time? Does it matter who he represented at the time?” Maddow asked. “We don’t have all the facts yet. Whether this lawyer told the FBI something wrong about who his client is, whether it is important to know who his client was when he gave this information to the FBI so that ‘he examines it, it’s something that may But the big picture here, the substance of the suspicion around the Alfa Bank stuff is that it could be evidence of a covert means of communication between a US presidential campaign and a foreign entity that was trying to influence our If you ran into that, you had a cybersecurity expert who was your client and he brought this data to you whether you worked for Hillary Clinton or worked for Donald Trump or worked for the fucking Donald Duck, if you were a computer scientist or experienced cybersecurity lawyer who has the cybersecurity skills to know what this data means, what the worst case scenario about it would really mean in terms of he national security of the country, the responsible thing to do is bring it to the FBI … That’s what they tell you to do. If you see something, say something, right? … Even if it turns out to be nothing, it seems like the right thing to do, an understandable thing to do in this circumstance, right? not ? “
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Well, the special advocate appointed by Bill Barr stayed in place during the Biden administration and apparently left room to wander by Attorney General Merrick Garland trying to criminalize this act. See something, say something “If you said anything about Donald Trump, we will try to put you in jail,” she added.
[ad_2]
Source link