[ad_1]
The planning of the highly anticipated testimony of former Special Adviser, Robert Mueller, was completely upset on Friday, with many sources stating that the hearing had been delayed due to a "broken negotiations" . Still others have indicated that they could continue as planned next week.
The internal talks on the structure of hearings originally scheduled for July 17 have been heating up for days and some members have complained that they may not have enough time to ask questions. Questions.
THE CONFUSION HANGS HANGS ON THE TESTIMONY OF MUELLER TENDS THAT DEMOCRATE PLANS MARATHON HEARINGS
Several sources said Friday morning that hearings will be postponed until July 24. A leading source said that there was a "breakdown of negotiations" for Mueller's appearance.
Yet the Democratic majority of the House's Judiciary Committee maintained: "At the moment, we are still planning to have our hearing on the 17th and we will let you know if that changes."
Mueller, who investigated the Russian interference in 2016 and released a report revealing no evidence of collusion with President Trump, is due to testify before the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees after being summoned by the panels on the month latest.
Mueller was scheduled to testify in public before the Judiciary Committee for two hours or more, followed by two hours of additional testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in an open setting.
But some first-year lawmakers this week have expressed concern over the possibility of not having the opportunity to question the former special council.
And there were contradictory details about the plans for a subsequent private session. A source told Fox News this week that the Democrats were planning to have Mueller testify behind closed doors – but it remains unclear whether Mueller would take part in the assembly himself or whether his deputies would answer the questions.
House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff of Calif., Said the closed session would only be held with the staff of the special council, but the chair of the House Judiciary Committee , Jerrold Nadler, of DN.Y., left the door open to the possibility Mueller could also testify privately. It is also unclear whether the two committees would hold a joint session in camera or two separate sessions.
"It's already a strange hearing, Nadler and Schiff contradicting each other publicly as to who will testify behind closed doors," Fox News told a Republican source member of one of the committees.
Nadler and Schiff have summoned Mueller last month, after the special advocate had already stated that he had no intention of testifying before Congress. In the midst of the audience format debate, Attorney General Bill Barr spoke of the possibility earlier this week of giving Mueller an exit ramp.
"I was disappointed to see the subpoena because I did not think it would be useless to drag Bob Mueller up, if in fact he was sticking to the report," Barr said Monday. "That seems to be the only reason to do it is to create some sort of public show. And if Bob decides that he does not want to be subject to this, the Justice Department will certainly support him.
Until now, nothing indicates that Mueller would withdraw. A spokesman for Mueller declined to comment.
In his only public appearance during his tenure as a special advocate in May, Mueller had said, "I hope and expect that this will be the only time I will talk to you about this case."
"There was talk of an appearance before the Congress," Mueller said. "Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our conclusions and our analysis, as well as the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose these words carefully and the work speaks for itself. "
THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE TARGET CHAMBER SUNDAY OF FIGURES RELATED TO THE TRUMPET LIKE GOP DECRIES & # 39; SUBPOENA BINGE & # 39;
During this press conference, Mueller announced the closure of his office and detailed the findings of the Russian investigation, pointing out that there were "not enough elements of evidence to accuse of conspiracy "with regard to 2016 presidential election. His speech on whether the president was obstructing justice nevertheless left the issue open and was perceived by the Democrats as a way to continue digging .
"If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so," Mueller said. "We did not determine if the president had committed a crime."
Mueller explained the long-standing policy of the Justice Department, which states that a president in office can not be charged with a crime, noting that "to accuse the president of a crime is not a crime". was not an option we could consider.
But congressional Democrats have taken Mueller's statement as a green light to intensify existing Trump-based investigations, with some calling for impeachment proceedings.
Meanwhile, President Trump has described Mueller's audience as another chapter of the Russian saga.
"It never ends," Trump said last month during an interview with Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business.
[ad_2]
Source link