Nadler: I do not understand why Mueller did not accuse Donald Trump Jr., of other people at the Trump Tower meeting



[ad_1]

representative Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerTim Ryan does not support the impeachment proceedings against Trump 4/20: will Congress advance marijuana legislation in 2019? Trump accuses the "fake media" & # 39; to "do everything possible to stir up anger". after the Mueller report MORE (D-N.Y.), The Speaker of the Judiciary Committee of the House, said Sunday that he did not understand why a special advocate Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud Mueller's choice to lead the investigation on Russia did not charge Donald Trump Jr.Donald (Don) John TrumpNadler: I do not understand why Mueller did not accuse Donald Trump Jr., of other people in the Trump Tower meeting, Impeachment? Not so fast without criminal criminal intent House Dem calls on lawmakers to "isolate" the electoral process following the Mueller PLUS report and other people involved in the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a criminal plot.

Nadler, appearing on "Meet the Press" on the NBC channel, said Mueller had said he had not sued those who had taken part in the meeting because he could not prove that they had deliberately lobbied. Intention to commit a crime.

"Well, you do not have to prove it," Nadler continued. "All you have to prove for conspiracy, is that they went into a meeting of minds to do something wrong and that they committed a manifest act." They went into a meeting of the spirits to attend a meeting to retrieve stolen material on Hillary.They went to the meeting.This is a conspiracy right there. "

The 2016 meeting would also have involved Trump's son-in-law, Jared KushnerJared Corey KushnerNadler: I do not understand why Mueller did not accuse Donald Trump Jr., of other people at the Trump Tower meeting. The Trump Tower meeting: an eloquent example of what should not be investigated dismissal? Not so fast without an element lacking criminal intent MOREand former Trump campaign president Paul ManafortPaul John ManafortNadler: I do not understand why Mueller did not accuse Donald Trump Jr., of other people at the Trump Tower meeting at the Trump Tower meeting: a shining example of what? Do not investigate the trial of an ex-Obama lawyer at the White House scheduled for August. According to Mueller's report, the partners accepted the meeting with a lawyer linked to Russia who had promised to dirty Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham Clinton: Part of the obstruction of justice proves intent, it's a job for Congress Nadler: I do not understand why Mueller did not accuse Donald Trump Jr., others at the Trump Tower meeting Kellyanne Conway: Mueller did not need to use the word "exoneration". in the PLUS report.

Mueller wrote in his report, released last week, that he was planning to lay charges because campaigns could not accept the help of a foreign government or foreign nationals.

"Based on the facts, the government would probably not be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the 9 June meeting generally knew that their behavior was illegal. the application of federal law to the relevant factual context, "Mueller added.

According to Mueller's more than 400-page report, the Special Council's office "did not obtain admissible evidence" that could demonstrate the prevailing legal standards according to which campaigners knew the action was illegal.

"The investigation did not provide evidence that meeting participants were familiar with the prohibition of foreign contributions" or the federal law that applied to the meeting and "does not have strong evidence of or attempts at meeting, "says the report.

Mueller concluded in his findings that the investigators had found "no documentary evidence" indicating that Trump had been informed of the June 2016 meeting.

[ad_2]
Source link