Nadler knows that he would be "completely humiliated" when he challenged McGahn's refusal to testify: Rep. McClintock



[ad_1]

The hearing of the House Judiciary Committee scheduled for the former White House lawyer, Don McGahn, was "stupid" and the chairman of the committee knew that he could not challenge in court the McGahn's refusal to comply with a subpoena, said Tuesday the representative Tom McClintock, R-Calif. .

"All of this is a political exercise, and Jerry Nadler will not sue him because he knows that if he does, he would be completely humiliated," McClintock said during his appearance in "Outnumbered" of Fox News .

"He wants the grievance, not the substance," added McClintock. His comments came as Nadler had vowed to "go to court" if necessary to force McGahn's testimony. McGahn skipped the audience after President Trump, who had invoked the executive's privilege ignoring the subpoenas, ordered him not to attend.

"In short, the President has taken the initiative to intimidate a witness who has the legal obligation to be here today," Nadler said.

NAPOLITANO: DON MCGAHN IN "AWKWARD" POSITION AFTER BEING REDUCED BY WHITE WHITE

But McClintock told Fox News host Harris Faulkner that Trump's actions were not new. "Almost every president since Harry Truman has ordered his subordinates to ignore congressional summonses and the courts to back them up every time," he said.

The reason, he said, is that "the executive and legislative powers are independent, separate and equal – I mean, let's just put the shoe on the feet, for example." Could President Trump force the lawyer General Jerry Nadler at the White House and testify under oath of his discussions with Jerry Nadler? Of course not. "

McGahn's refusal seemed to fuel new speculation as to whether the Democrats would try to dismiss the president – a choice they seemed divided on. Representative David Cicillini, D-RE, who sits on the Judiciary Committee, said a dismissal investigation was appropriate if McGahn refused to testify.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"They have been completely obsessed and absorbed by this problem," said McClintock, questioned about the impeachment. He suggested that Democrats in the judiciary spend too much time investigating Trump while they should be focusing on issues such as the law of immigration.

"It's something they've been calling for for two and a half years, they will not accept the 2016 election and it's all part of this story that will continue until the end of the year." 2020, "said McClintock.

Alex Pappas of Fox News contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link