[ad_1]
Asked about the difficulties of governing a caucus in the House, AOC and others like her, challenges to be met at every turn – Liberals elected in recent cycles and deeply skeptical about the party's constitution – Pelosi has said: "These are people who have a large number of followers on Twitter, which is important, that is, we have a lot of votes in the House."
Pelosi did not mention AOC's name. But you'd have to be a real model to not understand who she was talking about.
Ocasio-Cortez has 3.9 million followers on Twitter, by far the most important of all members of the House – including Pelosi (
2.4 million followers). And AOC is an active user of Twitter, often using the social media site to denounce what it believes to be an injustice within the Democratic Party or to repel stories about them.
The somewhat subtle stroking of Pelosi at AOC is not an isolated event either. In February, she was asked about the "Green New Deal", a comprehensive legislative proposal with which Ocasio-Cortez is closely linked, which aims to meet the challenges of climate change. "This will be one of the many, if not many, suggestions we will receive," said Pelosi disdainfully. "The green dream, or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they are for, is not it?"
Yeaaaaaah.
If you think that Pelosi's comments on AOC are accidental and do not aim to send a very clear message to AOC, you know little about Pelosi. What message does it send? This one: Listen, I've been liberal liberal longer than you've been on earth. But not all members of the House of Democrats represent the same constituencies as we do. And we must understand that they are governed by a different set of political realities. The most important thing we do is not to score ideological points. It's a law passed as a united caucus – to show all Americans that we do the work, not just to play partisan games.
Pelosi's comments are part of a broader confrontation between the party and the new liberal branch. The Democratic Congress campaign committee, the party's campaign arm, has decided to ban all transactions (money) from consultants working for prime ministers. The goal is simple: the threat of losing customers will keep the best consultants away from the main competitors. Theoretically, this means fewer primary challengers. What a democratic institution – led by DCCC President Cheri Bustos – feels it is a very good thing.
AOC, which itself has ousted a holder of his post in 2018,
taken to Twitter to protest the moving. She described the policy as "extremely confrontational and detrimental to the party" and urged donors of nominal value to "suspend" their contributions to the DCCC and focus instead on giving vulnerable incumbents vacant seats.
These loopholes in the House's democratic caucus are, in some respects, the natural result of obtaining the majority. The more seats you control, the more likely you are to meet people from all over the ideological spectrum – all of them wishing to be in their own way. the way.
This is also part of an even larger battle being waged in the Democratic Party as activists and candidates navigate a post-Obama and post-Clinton landscape. At the presidential level, you have Joe Biden, the former vice president, while Bernie Sanders – and a number of other candidates – offer a more liberal and more foreign perspective.
Pelosi, on the other hand, is an absolute reality in terms of the political realities facing the party – and the Liberals' challenges in moving the center of gravity further to the left. "As I say to my own district," you're going to elect 218 people, as in San Francisco, so we'll be able to talk, "she told USA Today.
[ad_2]
Source link
