Nancy Pelosi says, "I'm not for dismissal"

by



[ad_1]

"I am not on trial," said Pelosi. "This is news, I'm going to give you news right now because I've never told anyone in the press before, but since you've asked, and I've thought about it: destitution is a factor of division in the country that unless there is something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I do not think we should go in that direction because it divides the country And it's just not worth it. "

The California Democrat also said Trump was "unacceptable" on a "moral", "intellectual" and "curious" level.

"No, I do not think he's fit to be president of the United States," she said.

Pelosi's comments on Monday are perhaps the strongest, but the speaker has reported for months its resistance to push for impeachment.
"This is not a place where I think we should go," Pelosi said in November 2017 on CNN's "State of the Union," at the Democrats' request to look to overthrow the president if they found the majority.

The remarks were made days after the House Judiciary Committee Chair, Jerry Nadler, announced an extensive investigation, sending letters to 81 people and entities – including the White House, the Department of Justice, senior campaign leaders, Trump Organization officials and the president's sons – about possible corruption, obstruction of justice and abuse of power. Democrats say that they exercise tight control over the administration, which Republicans have refused to do during the first two years of Trump's presidency.

Pelosi's comments may help Democrats in competitive districts stand out from a point of contention, but they could also frustrate some of those currently in the midst of Congressional investigations.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, told CNN that he "expressed himself differently" from Pelosi.

"The Constitution calls for dismissal in cases of corruption, treason and other crimes and crimes of great magnitude," he said. "So the legal case has to be convincing, the evidence has to be overwhelming and the policy has to be bipartite, maybe it's not worth it, but it's not the norm." The country is certainly worth it if the Constitution and the public interest require it. "

"There have, of course, been cases where indictment investigations have been unified, as with Richard Nixon," Raskin added.

Some Democratic members of Congress have already submitted articles of dismissal. Last week, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democratic freshman, announced that she would be filing such a resolution this month.

But House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff told CNN that he was in agreement with Pelosi and that a "failed dismissal would not be a good idea". The California Democrat added that it was not logical to commit to this path in the absence of very graphic evidence. "

This story has been updated with additional developments on Monday.

Ashley Killough, Jeremy Herb, CNN Manu Raju and Elizabeth Landers contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link