[ad_1]
Unwilling to wait for Nancy Pelosi to embrace their cause, House Democrats in favor of dismissal began recruiting other MPs in their camp to put more pressure on the Speaker of the House.
One legislator described the effort as "organic". But the goal is clear: lawmakers hope to build a critical mass of members that will force Pelosi to choose between challenging the majority of his own caucus or moving forward with a process. remove the President from office – a step that has not been taken for more than 20 years.
To do this, pro-impeachment members have held meetings with other Democrats over the past week – and plan to do so in the coming months – to try to sell them against the background of the impeachment process, according to three sources direct knowledge of this effort. Among the points highlighted, it should be emphasized that the fact of engaging in impeachment proceedings could consolidate the control activity exercised around President Donald Trump, in addition to strengthening the party's desire to set a goal. legislative authority for his investigative work.
A senior House aide, whose leader is in the camp in favor of the impeachment, said the current efforts to present the affair to the imminent members are "fanciful at the moment". But the assistant was waiting for it to come to fruition. a single legislator becoming the point of contact for the operation and a formal list of objectives being developed.
"To maintain the momentum, it takes a more organized operation," said the assistant.
The mere fact that informal "whip" operations are taking place is a sign of the growing impatience and frustration felt by the pro-impeachment crowd on the hill. It also threatens to exacerbate tensions in the Democratic caucus, where some of the party's moderate members and senior party leaders have resisted pressure to act more aggressively on impeachment.
When MPs returned from the Memorial Day plenary on Monday, Democratic leaders staged a show of strength for the Pelosi impeachment line at an in camera meeting of members. Some legislators, including Caucus Chair Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), have spoken out in support of it. Jeffries invoked a quote from Ben Franklin, stating that they might be ruled by passion and not by reason.
According to two sources familiar with the meeting, the President expressed concern that the public still does not understand how the impeachment process will unfold. She pointed out that during the judicial vacations in California, well-educated voters did not seem to understand that impeachment proceedings would not necessarily result in the immediate removal of Trump.
Even in the ranks of Pelosi's leadership, rumors have been expressed about the willingness to ensure that the indictment process receives a more favorable reception in public. At Monday's meeting, Representative David Cicilline (DR.I.) – the only executive member to explicitly approve an impeachment investigation – urged lawmakers to send two messages during their appearances on television: the party's national agenda and their belief that the president was not "above the law." Pelosi, pointing at him, said: "Everyone should follow your advice, including understood yourself, "in what has been interpreted as a blow against the inclination of the congressman to insist on the latter and not on the first during his own televised successes.
But Cicilline is not the only one among the leaders to be imputed to the impeachment. The whip of the majority of the House, James Clyburn (D-S.C.), Said Sunday that he thought the chamber would eventually move to the impeachment procedure, but not now. And collaborators said that Jeffries, who hails from a New York Liberal district, was in conflict, though ultimately he continues to support the speaker.
For members who have already spoken, questions remain about the commitment of leadership to slow down the impeachment process. One legislator said Pelosi was only reacting slightly against the faction in favor of impeachment, calling for her efforts to convince her fellow Democrats that it would be a bad policy, a "soft whip". Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY), who supports dismissal, said Pelosi had not told him to lower the tone. "I'm not aware that she did it with anyone," he told the Daily Beast. "I think everyone lets just about everyone do their own thing."
But not everyone is convinced that Pelosi will not be bothered by recruitment efforts in impeachment. The deputy chief of the Chamber said that one of the reasons advanced democrats did not make in favor of the beginning of the indictment procedure was the fear of publicly crossing Pelosi.
"It's a bit like a discrete threat. I do not think she said, "Do not go out and whip the others," said the assistant. "We know that if you do that, you challenge the President and she will remember it when you need something. She has the longest memory of anyone.
The Pelosi office declined to comment.
Since last week's special advisor Robert Mueller's press conference – in which he recalled the point in his report that he could not relieve the president of his wrongdoing – a number of Democratic members have called for the launch of an official impeachment investigation. In total, the impeachment caucus now has more than 50 members, and others, in camera, have stated that obtaining access to the underlying evidence of the Mueller report would help them less to advance.
However, it is unclear if the evidence can be obtained. For weeks, the Trump administration has ignored requests and subpoenas from Democrats to obtain more documents and testimony related to Mueller's investigation and findings. The walls left the militants alarmed, fearing that the Democrats essentially allow the administration to slow down the process of control to make it non-existent.
"They definitely stumbled," said Max Bergman, who heads the Moscow project, an initiative of the Center for the American Progress Action Fund. "As a result, the White House's misinformation campaign had a real impact and helped blur the cards. It's the most damning official report ever written about a president and Democrats must talk about it. "
Recognizing that their current approach has so far failed to stir public opinion, the Democrats said they were changing tactics and refocusing more on the very content of the report. On Monday, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Jerry Nadler (DN.Y.), announced that his committee would hold a series of hearings featuring legal experts, including Richard Nixon's former lawyer, John Dean, to keep the light on what Mr. Mueller had discovered.
On Twitter, some-including Matt Gaetz (R-FL), a member of the GOP committee member – jokingly asked if the Democrats knew which president, Trump or Nixon, was being investigated. But Democrats have defended this approach against the stone wall of the current administration.
"Obviously," said Representative Ted Deutch (D-FL), "we would like to hear the topics discussed in the Mueller report instead of the experts talking about the Mueller report".
"The idea here is to refocus this debate on where it should be, whether the US President violated his oath, stood above the law and potentially committed crimes and serious offenses. "
And on Monday evening, at a regular meeting, members of the House discussed their intention to vote next week to sentence Attorney General Bill Barr, disregarding the non-compliance with a subpoena for one version. unpublished report of Mueller and the underlying evidence.
Publicly, and even privately, Democrats who support impeachment have little to say about Pelosi, even if they try to put pressure on her.
Rep. Madeleine Dean (D-PA) in the suburbs of Philadelphia last week told the Daily Beast she was encouraging her colleagues to support the impeachment process. The Judicial Commission member added that she had also encouraged Nadler to do so.
But she was more cautious when it came to the presidency. "She stands apart from the little ones and the little ones in which the president would like to train," Dean said. "I am one of the infantry judicial and financial committees, and she has to take care of something much bigger."
[ad_2]
Source link