Napolitano: Fox's Mueller report could be enough to sue Trump

Andrew Napolitano, Fox News legal analyst, said Thursday that the evidence detailed in the special advocate Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud Mueller's choice to lead the investigation on RussiaThe report of "could be enough to continue" President TrumpDonald John TrumpL's American People Shows Trump Trump's People's Support Trump Addresses Libyan Rebel General Attacking Tripoli Legislature Dem: Mueller Report Shows "Substantial Set of Evidence" on Clog.

"Depending on how you look at them, it may be enough to sue," said Napolitano in his series "Judge Napolitano's Chambers."

"But he was showing a venal, amoral and deceitful Donald Trump, who advised his associates to lie and wanted to help them do it. It's not good for the President of the United States, "he added.

"On the obstruction of justice … the president is not really clear," he said on the show, conjuring up nearly a dozen of them. examples of potential obstruction detailed in the report.

Napolitano had already taken part in the Mueller report last month, following a summary published by the Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham A BarrEx-FBI official: "Links and coordination" with Russia occur daily A legislator of the law on democracy: A report by Mueller indicates a "substantial body of evidence" concerning the obstruction New normality: a president can freely interfere in investigations without going to prison MORE.

"In the 700-page summary of the 2 million pages of raw evidence, there is definitely evidence of a conspiracy and evidence of obstruction of justice," said Napolitano last month. "Just not enough evidence."

The Justice Ministry on Thursday released Mueller's report on its nearly two-year investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election. The report details 10 episodes in which Trump may have interfered with justice.

In a summary of the report before its publication, Barr stated that Deputy Attorney General Rob Rosenstein and himself had felt that there was not enough evidence to prosecute the president in a charge of 39, obstruction of justice.