[ad_1]
“From a global perspective, I think it’s encouraging that there is an urgent need to move away from the status quo as this clearly won’t work with the Alston decision,” said Amy Perko, CEO of the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. , which called for sweeping reforms. “But even before the Alston decision, it wasn’t working.”
The empowerment of college sports conferences, which have gained inordinate influence over the years as media rights brokers, could enable university presidents and chancellors “to make bold decisions, and they should be able to do so at the level. of the conference with more like-minded schools, ”said Perko.
In an interview Thursday night, Greg Sankey, the commissioner of the Southeastern Conference, said NCAA officials had not presented him with a plan to implement Emmert’s ideas and that he would study closely. any proposal. But Sankey noted that proposals in recent years to give Power 5 conferences greater control over their operations have met with resistance.
He also said university sports leaders could not dwell on the changes.
“I don’t think we have several years to figure this out,” Sankey said. “I haven’t taken anything away from the Supreme Court’s comment in the Alston decision which suggests we have a few years to find a new approach.”
Some of Emmert’s concerns are concentrated in sports other than basketball and football, which fuel the financial might of the industry. He suggested, for example, that college athletic officials consider relaxing the rules that limit competition within conferences and the three divisions of the NCAA.
“We’ve made it pretty complex to come out of the conference and how it all works,” Emmert said. “It works well for basketball, football, a number of sports, but it doesn’t work as well for others, so we need to be a lot more flexible than we have been.”
Emmert said he expects various NCAA boards to consider ideas in the coming months.
[ad_2]
Source link