[ad_1]
The judge reads passages. "I understand why some attacks are committed." She refers in her notes to the attacks in Paris and Brussels. "They were committed by soldiers called by Allah, in retaliation for the attack on Syria by the West". S. says that at that time she was more derogatory than now. "I think differently now."
The word "jihad" falls. She understands that people can be afraid of that. "It is associated with attacks and beheadings." But S. has a different feeling with the word. "It also means engaging in the struggle with your ego, the inner jihad." The woman indicates that it is for this reason that she has tried to go to Syria.
She failed. In her own words, she was stopped at the border and she fell to the ground. The judge still reads it in a newspaper, in which she says that she has tried to cross several times. S. also writes that she failed to get in touch with the people she had come to pick up.
Helping refugees in Syria
It is not clear who they are. She says that she wanted to help the refugees. It was not necessary in Turkey, she said. "There they were carefully cared for." In order to help people, she had to cross the border to get to Syria.
But according to the letters addressed to his parents and his sister, something else appears. "It's part of my life and my choice for my work for IS," says Lieke S. She also says that IS is much more expensive than people think
"Not Available"
More later she also writes to her She adds that she "should be very careful and that if she comes back she may not be available for long." After a few months in Turkey, she decides to return to the Netherlands. She is arrested during the return trip
The court is struggling to juxtapose what S. wrote at the time and what she now tells. This seems to be in contradiction with each other. The Crown will appear in court later today
Source link
