"Samsung smartphones are mostly broken"

When you make repairs on smartphones as a company, you can get really nice data. That's exactly what Blancco is doing and these data are clear in a report.

Kapot

In this report, we read that during the first quarter of this year, more Androidsmartphones (18.9%) broke than iPhones (15.2%). And those Androids smartphones that broke down were distributed as follows on the brands.

According to Blancco's report, Samsung is the head and shoulders of other brands More than 27% of returned devices belong to the Samsung brand The least device performance was the Samsung Galaxy S7 with 9% followed by the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge with 8% and the Samsung Galaxy S5 with 5% .C is a report from the United States, we also see a number of brands Not knowing not Europe, like 10or (tenor) and InFocus.

The biggest problem (34%) among the Android smartphones that the company has received was the performance of the device . After the problems came with, among other things, the camera and the microphone. Comparing the numbers with those of a year ago, the main issues are completely different from those of 2017. This suggests that there are many new devices that have problems in the performance field. What does not help either, is the fact that Blancco still finds that many Android devices run on outdated versions.

What is most striking in the graph above is that so many devices have been returned with Android 2.3 as devices with Android 8.0.

Conclusion

Figures are numbers and they usually say the truth when they are interpreted in the right way, but we can not verify the truth, but we assume that this report has been prepared with great care, and Samsung should rely on these numbers. start thinking where he went wrong with the Samsung Galaxy S7.Striking is that the S7 and S5 in the top 3 were but that the Samsung Galaxy S6 was not in.

Note:

We have made inquiries to the creator of Blancco reports how the figures arrived. When we have a reaction we will make an update

Source: Report Blancco

Spelling errors, language errors or errors detected? Send an email to the author of this article!