[ad_1]
The daily De Telegraaf writes this morning. "It seems like your franchise role in today's retail landscape is very problematic. As a result, there is a negative future for HEMA as long as it is bound by the current franchise agreement with annexes and addenda, "the newspaper quotes a letter from Hema management to all franchisees. The reason seems to be the failure of Hema's sale by Core Equity Holding. The deal with the Belgian investor up to 1 billion euros seemed to be in jars and jars, but the current franchise agreement was finally a reason for the Belgians to cancel the deal. last minute agreement.
It was not the first time that the sale of Hema by owner Lion Capital did not take place. The British investor, who bought Hema in 2007 for 1.1 billion euros, made unsuccessful attempts to sell Hema. Under the leadership of Lion Capital, Hema is particularly developed internationally. However, the debt of the department store chain ensured that the previously prosperous Hema was in deficit for years. In the letter to franchisors, Hema management now claims that the franchise system must be shoveled to make Hema more salable.
Important Online Dispute Dispute
An important part of the agreement regulates that franchisors communicate in the department store group 's online business figure. This would negatively affect the value of Hema's sales. The distribution of online sales is most often the use of disagreements between distribution chains and their franchisors. This is also part of the long struggle between Albert Heijn and his franchisors. Here, however, it is true that franchisors do not share the online business figure.
40% of Dutch franchisors in Hema
About 40% of Hema's branches are owned by an independent contractor. In recent years, the necessary legal procedures have already taken place between the two parties. Unsuccessful attempts by franchisors to better protect their rights by incorporating a franchise code into the law.
See also: Hema takes over his own stores of the NS
Source link