[ad_1]
Cabinet Provides an Explanation of Additional Vote to the United Nations Pact on Migration, Noting that the Content of the Treaty Is Not Legally Binding, as Confirmed by Statements of from Volkskrant .
plans to sign the pact, but after political unrest, it was decided to add an additional statement to the agreements.
The pact, which will be voted on December 10 and 11 in Marrakesh Morocco, will include agreements on: safe and regulated migration. Reference is made to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees the rights of refugees and migrants.
In the pact, countries declare that migration is a global problem that can not be solved by countries alone and that international cooperation is therefore necessary. The treaty explicitly states that agreements are not legally binding and that there is no transfer of sovereignty.
Opponents of migration fear sovereignty infringement
Nevertheless, in a number of countries, the statement of intent, which is also known, raises concerns. like the pact of Marrakech. The right-wing populist anti-government governments of the United States, Hungary, and Austria, among others, have already announced that they will not hear
. The House of Representatives also worries anti-immigrant parties PVV and FvD. For weeks, they argued that asylum lawyers who signed a Marrakesh pact could enforce treaty agreements.
In recent weeks, this message has been heard by the right-wing coalition parties, the VVD and the CDA. They also want to know what the legal consequences are.
Rutte: "Pact says it's not a legally binding document"
Prime Minister Mark Rutte has repeatedly stated that the pact respects the sovereignty of states and is legally binding. "The text of the pact literally says that it is not a legally binding document, on which I base myself," said Rutte earlier this month
"And that means that we have the right to manage our own borders, We can distinguish between regular migration and irregular migration, all in accordance with our own legislation. "
Nevertheless, Secretary of State Mark Harbers (Asylum ) has been working for a month on a legal analysis following Thierry's parliamentary questions. Donkey (FvD). A debate on the migration pact should take place next week. The legal analysis must be completed before that.
In anticipation of this, the government now proposes an additional vote explanation in which the preservation of national sovereignty is put forward. For D66, which is for the pact, it's not a problem. For the Government party, the supplementary declaration does not change the content of the treaty.
Do you want to know every morning what you missed during the night and what will happen that day? Subscribe now to our This is the information letter!
Source link
