'Cabinet wants to subsidize the purchase of electric cars to the tune of 6,000 euros in 2021 & # 39; – IT Pro – News

It turns out that politics is like a cat and so makes strange jumps. These measures aim to reduce combined CO2 emissions by indicating that electrical systems do not emit CO2 because they do not produce an exhaust. It's actually quite strange if we consider that the bulk of our electricity is generated by a coal-fired power plant and that carbon is used as fuel. This fact is remarkable because diesel and gasoline, like coal, have the largest share of carbon to burn and oxidize with CO2 in oxygen.

It is therefore doubtful that electric driving really allows a reduction of CO2 in comparison. with diesel powered cars
Let's do a math it's worthwhile to ban diesel to save the climate.

I start with diesel:
According to the diesel wiki, diesel emits 2.7 kg of CO2 / liter of diesel. (If you look closely, the diesel includes all losses on 3.5 kg of CO2 / liters of diesel, this engine is unfortunately not found in the coal)
Source: https: //nl.wikipedia .org / wiki / Diesel Oil & https://www.vbr.nl/mvo/wetenswaardigheden/

If you assume a consumption of 1 to 20, you get 5 liters of diesel / 100 km. => per 100 km, this corresponds to 5 liters x 2.7 kg of CO2 = 13.5 kg of CO2 / 100 km

Electric car:
The fact of looking at the electric driving then determines how many kg of CO2 are released per kWh of electricity. For electricity, I have assumed a mix of power because it also occurs. I chose an independent institute as a source, but others calculate it. Since the sun and the wind are only 1% and 4% of our electricity production and, overall, they represent only 1% of the final energy consumption, we can not take them separately and we have to do with the mix of electricity as you take it. I therefore assumed 0.5 kg CO2 / kWh.
Source: https://www.ce.nl/publica…stroomaanbod-in-nederland

If you leave an electric car a stove consuming 25 kWh / 100 km consumes 0.5 x 25 = 12.5 kg of CO2 / 100 km of emissions.

Here are the necessary disadvantages. For example, there is the transportation loss required for non-pumpable fuels to the power plant. The current fluctuates and the necessary heat is generated during charging and can not be spent profitably (+/- 20% loss). It is also true that electric cars can not use the residual heat of the engine for heating, so that it must be generated separately.

Again, the production of a battery does not go unnoticed by the bad conditions prevailing in Congo. Nor is it easy to process because, for example, Priussen use nickel metal hydride dry cells which can be separated with the Eddy Current process. But modern batteries are wet by the liquid electrolyte and the ballistic separation does not work as well.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b0nwPgWh8Q

To produce the magnets, it is not ideal with the toxic lake in China [19659002] So it is the question of what we agree with, because there is no vision of a clean electricity production, there is no reduction of CO2 emissions per kilometer traveled. The production and processing of old parts also have no advantages over the current situation. However, it costs money, a lot of money and the question is whether it is spent significantly.