Holleeder Lawyer: Ignore the Supreme Court's decision Interior

LIVE – Saskia Belleman is present at the trial. You can read his tweets at the bottom of this article (around 10 am)

The Holleeder and OM Defense have had the opportunity to respond to the Supreme Court's decision as part of the grand process. Clearance Passage. At the end of April, he stated in particular that the Crown's agreements with Crown witnesses Peter La S. and Fred R. were legal and that their statements were useful to the Crown. the proof. The two also declared themselves incriminated in the case against Holleeder.

The Supreme Court should never have reached this conclusion, according to Janssen. He believes the court should ignore it. The council stressed on the basis of a series of parliamentary documents that the uncontrollable financial agreements concluded, in particular with the S., were contrary to the law. "The Supreme Court says that the legislation on this point is not clear, with all due respect it is absurd, I call you and ask you to tell the criminal prosecution service: goes beyond its borders. "You can not say on the basis of the decision that La S.'s statements in this case are reliable and usable, as OM did. Over time, these statements have been adjusted and over-adjusted on important points. "

Willem Holleeder remained in a brief statement Thursday with his earlier denials. He will hear the verdict in his case on July 4th.