Tips from Amsterdam GroenLinks Advisors on Gambling | inside

However, Van Gils had previously informed the Rotterdam council that he felt nothing for repayment. At the beginning of the debate, Meliani acknowledged that things were not well communicated. It was not the first time, note advisers. In addition, the information known for months at Stopera was only revealed after long insistence from critical advisers. According to Meliani, council members asked him for "irrelevant" information, which caused a lot of resentment in the VVD, Forum for Democracy, Thought, Party for Animals, CDA, PvdO, CU and BIJ1 . They thought that the councilor should refrain from any qualification, because the council itself decides what is relevant or not. The departure of Van Gils on July 1, 2018, Van Gils gave advice. He was seconded during the following period (until 1 January 2019) and was still employed at the municipality for 12 hours. The big question is whether it could actually be found in the Stopera during this time. "Could it be that Van Gils has not done anything for the municipality of Amsterdam during this period?" Asked Party animal leader Van Lammeren. Meliani: "It may be true."

It was striking that GroenLinks, D66, PvdA, and SP were talking about Van Gils in rather big terms, but did not add butter to the fish yesterday. "There is nothing wrong," said GroenLinkser Femke Roosma (who, after the debate, burst into tears). Later, she came back to her words: there was something wrong. She found it particularly regrettable that the previous conference did not make good arrangements with Van Gils regarding the recording of time. As a result, it is now impossible to determine if Van Gils could or could not be found in the Stopera when he was paid and that he was getting a golden handshake.

Mysterious

Gils has a contract with the municipality. Meliani refused this, as did the sending of a judicial inquiry. "It's a fundamental choice not to share that," Meliani said. "Do something mysterious again, again!", Said Rik Torn (VVD).

The opposition asked Meliani to apologize for not having properly informed the council, but Meliani has however repeatedly stated that she "regretted" and "could have been more specific in her remarks." The opposition filed applications to remove her from her post and to entrust the portfolio of human resources to Alderman Udo Kock (Finance) .The motion did not succeed, but Meliani is shocked by the hard words

It is suspected that the last word has not yet been A survey is still ongoing at the Ministry of the Interior because the accountant was also unable to determine whether Van Gils was working or not. law on the normalization of higher income.If this is the case, you must always recover the money van Gils.