[ad_1]
In a 30-page judgment, the State Council rescinds all objections against Windpark Fryslân in the IJsselmeer. All arguments that 89 wind turbines have unacceptable consequences for the landscape and nature, birds, bats and fish, shipping and tourism have been rejected from the framework of the highest judge's assessment. administrative. Read more
The State Council does not want to sit in the chairmanship of ministers who decided that wind was needed. It's up to politics. However, the administrative judge assesses whether the government could reasonably have reached this position: was there sufficient knowledge of the relevant facts and interests, is the motivation strong and there are no disadvantages? disproportionate? There is also a regularity test
"The argument fails", is 28 times the conclusion of the State Council. More than twenty organizations / companies and five individuals who have applied to the courts should do so
The depositories live too far
The individuals of Burgum, Dokkum and Den Helder live too far to to be interested. According to the judge,
This applies even to two people living in a holiday home in Makkum, about 6.6 kilometers from future factories. Only those who live at a distance of ten times the height of wind turbines count. It's over 1800 meters here.
The judge says in other words of possible negative effects on tourism and the economy that you can reason differently, but that it is not a requirement that the there should be no negative consequences. of the project for the nature have been quite well studied, is the conclusion every time. On several occasions, the State Council has based itself on the "expert report" of the Stichting Advising Bestuursrechtspraak voor Middle in Ruimtelijke Ordening in The Hague
