Babies born with manipulated DNA? & # 39; Until this is true & # 39;



[ad_1]

A Chinese scientist claims to have placed the first genetically modified babies in the world. Binoculars Lulu and Nana were born this month. Colleagues want to see the evidence first.

If this statement is true, it would mean significant progress in this controversial area. Renowned sources such as the AP news agency and the MIT University have therefore devoted exclusive reports to the report, although Chinese researcher He Jiankui presented his work in a video. YouTube rather than a professional journal.

Remarkably enough the hospital to which he is connected announces an investigation into the state of the art. A spokesman said that the experiment was not conducted there and that the twins were not born there. The university where he is under contract also distances himself from the action of his.

Sensation

"It's crazy that this is released to the world via YouTube," says Professor Niels Geijsen, who is researching the method used. "Usually, these kinds of results are published in scientific journals so that other scientists can evaluate them and we will have to wait."

"Is this a news? It's a sensation anyway," said Judges Geijsen. "I think the soup will not be eaten as hot, but she will sing everywhere, I think it's important to interpret and put it in context."

'Sowing Panic'

Human DNA is controversial on the medical and ethical levels. Supporters view this as a revolutionary way to prevent genetic disorders, but it is not clear yet what long-term dna changes will mean for children. There is also the danger that parents "shop" to give certain characteristics to their children.

He rejects this criticism. "The media was also disgusted when Louise Brown was born as the first IVF baby, but in the last forty years her legislation and standards were developed in conjunction with IVF," he says. "I understand that my work is controversial, but I think families need it."

[ad_2]
Source link