Critical regulatory body on the implementation of the intelligence law: "Too much, it's illegal"



[ad_1]

"But in other cases, we simply find that a hacking or a fuss is going too far," said President Moussault. The reasons why requests are most often rejected are unknown.

Not only were the applications rejected: one in ten AIVD applications was not assessed directly because the Oversight Committee received too little information to be able to rule properly. . In these cases, the department was asked to provide more information. In a small number of cases, the services decided to withdraw an application after requesting more information.

Censored statistics

The frequency with which the intelligence services present a request for listening or piracy is not known. The review committee wanted to announce it, but the department retaliated. In a report sent to the House of Representatives this afternoon, the statistics were omitted. According to the departments, statistics are state secrets.

The figures could be published in the annual report of the review committee, which will be published next year. According to the intelligence services, the statistics give too much price to malicious people when they are broadcast twice a year

"We use the principle that we want to be as transparent as possible," says Moussault of the regulator. "But it is ultimately up to the ministers to decide what should be made public or not."

[ad_2]
Source link