[ad_1]
Gijs van Dam commenced an Article 12 proceeding against Jelle Brandt Corstius. Van Dam, accused by Brandt Corstius of alleged rape, asked the court in early October to determine whether the prosecutor should sue the presenter for defamation and slander.
Brandt Corstius said Wednesday refrain from any legal proceedings against Van Dam. The two men were on a night shift fifteen years ago. Brandt Corstius declared a year ago in an article Trouw that he would have had sex against his will that night.
Although the name of Van Dam is not mentioned in the article, his description was: to clarify that it was the television producer with whom Brandt Corstius had collaborated.
"We have good reason to say that defamation and defamation have been proven," says Van Dam. "It started when he called me Trouw The newspaper did not check anything, he threw the story on the front page, my life was literally destroyed."
Geen #MeToo [19659007] Van Dam does not think people still see him as a rapist. He reproaches Brandt Corstius for not going to the police if he felt that the sexual intercourse had not taken place by mutual consent. "One year has been removed," Van Dam says. It was not #MeToo, it was an equal sex between two boys of the same age, in equal proportions.
Van Dam earlier complained of Brandt Corstius's defamation, but on 19 July it was announced that Brandt Corstius had sued Van Dam and had insufficient evidence in both cases.
Wednesday , it was announced that Jelle Brandt Corstius had decided not to initiate any proceedings under Article 12. "decided not to initiate proceedings under Article 12", states l & # Lawyer Nico Meijering against RTL Boulevard . " Many legal and business reasons justified it, but the client at #MeToo with its publication in Trouw achieved its objective and wishes to make an additional point on this issue. "
Source link
