[ad_1]
Jelle Brandt Corstius will not lodge a complaint against Gijs van Dam. The presenter filed a statement last year about an alleged rape. It was previously known that the prosecution was not prosecuting, but there would be no more procedure called Article 12.
This is confirmed Wednesday by his lawyer, Nico Meijering RTL Boulevard . "My client has chosen not to initiate proceedings under Article 12," says Meijering. "Legally and on a case-by-case basis, there was every reason to do so, but the client achieved its goal in the context of #MeToo with its publication in Trouw and wishes to make an additional point to this subject."
The procedure of Article 12 begins when the public prosecutor decides not to prosecute, but when the interested parties consider that the case should be brought to court. During the course of the proceedings, they may appeal directly to a court of appeal
Insufficient evidence against Van Dam
On July 19 of this year, it became clear that the Crown did not have a court of law. had not prosecuted. There is no sufficient evidence that Gijs van Dam Brandt Jelle would have drugged and violated Corstius. The case of defamation and defamation against Brandt Corstius was also filed.
Van Dam subsequently indicted Brandt Corstius for defamation and defamation. The indictment is a reaction to statements by Brandt Corstius in the press release that he issued after learning that the prosecution would not prosecute the prosecutor. with people like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, suspected of sexual abuse. He also stated in this statement that Van Dam had headed the line, which, according to Plasman, was incorrect
. According to Plasman, Van Dam was examining his complaint. "We have not finished yet," he says in RTL Boulevard . "We are now waiting for the treatment of the court, it has not yet rid us of us."
Van Dam never denied having sexual contact
Van Dam and Brandt Corstius both had a lawsuit against each other. According to the presenter, he was allegedly drugged by Van Dam in 2002 and forced to have sex. That's what he said – not to mention the name of Van Dam – in an article by Trouw at the time of the # metoo debate. During this period, not only many famous foreign actors and actresses, but also well-known Dutch, knew that they had been victims of sexual abuse in the past. Van Dorp were employed, never refused. He says indeed that it was not about coercion or doping.
Van Dam then charged Corstius with defamation. On July 19, it was known that in both cases, no prosecution was initiated because the indications provided were insufficient.
Source link
