[ad_1]
By Anonymous: Rather something that is not there, so you imagined this nonsense.
Just after more posts you see that it's not an imagination. You also start with BSN …
https://nos.nl/artikel/2240166-fiscus-mag-bsn-nummer-zzp-ers-niet-meer-openbaar-maken.html
Scheefwonen duo and forget the care?
And it's a good idea, but that does not seem very useful. We will come back now. Well, many of us knew it from the beginning, but officials and officials did not want to know
that's fine, but for what exactly did we put that figure except to make mandatory a new mandatory check? ? Someone & # 39; one?
The forgotten passport business, politically not practical to start a difficult ICT project where you only suffer damage.
You still claim, but "slaughter with nonsense" I can agree with. "Solid authentication" less, because it is not what matters. It is permissive, and how you do that, you have more options in that you move away from the "first identification than authenticating that identity" (and then pass the "authorization" piece because you did not know it was the most important thing the latter is often damned.)
http://www.infosectoday.com/Articles/AU5219_C01.pdf J & # 39: like to follow the standard names here
Authentication – to prove that the claim of identity with a probability according to the risk
Authorization – The actions you are allowed to perform in order to l 39; authorization to identify in a certain setting
This happens, yes. And that means that the SoFi / BSN has unwanted side effects, so the total costs of having a BSN could outweigh the benefits. ..
No supervision of the freedom to commit fraud is very expensive. The VAT is about 52 billion equal to wages / incomes and bonuses. The gap (possible fraud) is 150 billion. https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/tax-cooperation-control/vat-gap_en
The costs of a BSN to make transparent everything related to the obligations are impossible to ignore.
The many errors in manual labor were too expensive to find a solution. There are still some frays that do not go.
The problem is precisely that the person / number link gives too much information, in general. In this case, something plays subtly differently: a ZZPer is both private and professional, and so the tax authorities thought that they were useful and the VAT number with the private number to build. Only this causes a ceiling problem for the ZZPer. He would have liked it better with a VAT number that has nothing to do with his private number, and for the tax authorities it makes little difference. It is therefore best to separate ZZPer and private person.
The Social Security number is your personal tax return, it's there that all adds up with a single tax return.
I still see the company's earnings as one of the headings of the personal statement.
If BV NV CV you have a different story that is established separately and the dga can change with wages and dividends.
Because Zzp-ers traditionally took its name, the social security number was added. For businesses, you have a RSIN story while Non-Resident runs recently through an RNI. We are talking about something that has been the case for 20 years or more
What does BSN actually give as information?
I think it's better than the ANF as information. A bsn is an unpredictable series of numbers in nl without background meaning. An independent worker will still have to give up a lot of names from the bank of origin. Also his passport (sensitive data processing, chain responsibility) for control etc. How else does he get orders?
This is not an excuse to make it easy for traders. ..
"Although it sounds useful, it does not make sense."
The marketer can not do much with that because it's not allowed. This is an argument that is irrelevant.
This does not really matter to them (the traders) because it does not have to be flawless.
Source link
