[ad_1]
By Anonymous:
Yes, look, but he has a virus scanner that is only getting better,
The fact that you are not a virus on Mac or Linux is absurd because otherwise , there would be no anti-virus scanners for Linux and Mac are.
The Windows firewall is more advanced than the Mac and Ubuntu firewall.
Although you thought (could hear about me), only I see a weak base. You can say that the Windows firewall is more advanced than Mac and Linux, but I get the impression that you only say that because you find it yourself.
Iptables, present on both Linux and Unix with all its derivatives, is itself a technology that is several years older than the Windows firewall. So, he had a lot more time to develop. I would like you to justify your request with tests that prove it.
I am now on Ubuntu and have just tested the Linux firewall on the 1056 most used ports. Maarreh … they are all closed to me. Everything is on "stealth", which means that all requests remain unanswered for the person who is hitting the firewall. In other words, the person does not recover any "echo" and can not do anything with it.
Nothing wrong with the Linux firewall.
Nobody claims that there is no virus for Mac or Linux. For Mac, the Internet seems to have existed, but for Linux, there is still no active virus known to date. There are a number of "proofs of concept", but they have only been tested in a controlled environment.
Is Linux 100% Virus Protected? No, not that, but the architecture is less vulnerable to design than Windows. A file can not be made executable on a Linux system because it requires root rights. Thus, the user is the only one who can create an executable file.
Source link
