[ad_1]
The latest news, reduced to their most severe terms: you had your inquiry, now we have ours.
The first survey, carried out relentlessly by Democrats and the media, was of course Mueller's investigation. Although the report contains damaging information about the actions of the Trump team, the essential is indisputable: no criminal charges are recommended.
The new investigation, long supported by Donald Trump, Republicans and conservative media, is aimed at investigating investigators.
As the New York Times reported for the first time, John Barr asked Connecticut US lawyer John Durham to look into the origins of the special advocate's investigation, especially the opening of the FBI counterespionage investigation on the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016.
This follows the DOJ's inspector general who investigated the 2016 wiretap applications and the political biases of FBI officials.
Obviously, the president could have declared victory after Mueller's conclusions and moved on. But this is a second inquiry into what he considers – maybe you've heard that before? – Partisan witch hunt
The Times called the latest investigation "a move that President Trump has long called for, but that could anger law enforcement officials who insist that the scrutiny of Trump's campaign is lawful. " I understand that there are legitimate questions about how the FBI of the Obama era dealt with the investigation, about the use of an informer against George Papadopoulos, on the anti-Trump texts by Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. But the GI could have managed that, and what makes me uncomfortable is that it brings the flair of return on investment.
SIGN UP FOR THE PODCAST BUZZMETER MEDIA MEDIA, A RIFF OF THE MOST HISTORIC DAYS
Christopher Wray, appointed by Trump to head the FBI, said last week that he knew of no illegal surveillance and that he would not call the work of his "espionage" agents. . For this, he begins to seek treatment.
SPLIT WITH BARR? DIRECTOR OF FBI WRAY SAYS MONITORING IS NOT THE SAME AS "ESPYING".
The president tweeted that "the FBI has no direction.The director protects the same gang (…) who tried to overthrow the president by an illegal state coup." (Recommended by the previous ministry of Justice)".
The language of the blow is regrettable. But if you see it this way, it is not difficult to evoke the image of a surviving general of a military coup and then order the conspirators' incarceration.
How does Wray think that the man who hired him to replace Jim Comey now says that the office has no leadership? And critics who say that Barr was turning the Mueller report will now consider the Attorney General as making Trump's request by ordering the new probe.
Trump told reporters yesterday that the Mueller probe was "the biggest hoax ever committed on the people of this country" and "I am so proud of our Attorney General that he is looking into the matter" while adding that he knew nothing of the decision in advance.
When asked if he had full confidence in Chris Wray, the president replied, "Well, I did not understand his answer" on the illegal surveillance. "I thought it was a ridiculous answer."
TRUMP RECEIVES THEIR FBI DIRECTION FOR & # 39; PROTECT PROBE RUSSIA & # 39; & # 39; GANG & # 39; & # 39;
The Washington Post notes that "Trump's campaign publicly calls for a criminal investigation of former FBI officials and makes" rampant "fundraisers, seeking to turn the tide and turn the inquiry into Russia. in a political asset instead of a liability. "
Moreover, even if Durham is named to Trump, Barr seems to have made the right choice.
Durham has been a lawyer at the Department of Justice for nearly forty years and has conducted several delicate investigations under Republican and Democratic administrations. These include the FBI's investigation of gangster Whitey Bulger and the CIA's destruction of video tapes of torture.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The American lawyer does not have special powers. He will report to Barr instead of serving as a special prosecutor.
Perhaps this latest survey will shed light on these questions about launching the investigation on Russia once and for all. But an equally likely outcome is that it is adopted by Trump supporters and rejected by its detractors, a further turn in the hyperparticipation that tarnished our law enforcement agencies. .
[ad_2]
Source link