New York Times anti-Semitic editorial cartoons provoke indignation among staff

by



[ad_1]

Now even President Trump intervenes.

But all this began Thursday when the New York Times International Edition published an anti-Semitic caricature portraying Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a leashed dog held by Blind President Trump. The picture was reminiscent of Nazi propaganda.

The international edition is only available outside the United States, so most employees at The Times headquarters in New York did not know until they read it. in a note from the editor published on Saturday.

In the editor's note, the Times admitted that the drawing was "offensive" and that "it was a misjudgment to publish it", but without going into the details of what was going wrong not.

Some press briefings incorrectly called the note an "excuse", which made people wonder why the Times did not apologize.

The controversy snowballed on social media until Sunday morning. CNN's Jake Tapper said on "The State of the Union" that the cartoon "could simply have easily appeared in ISIS or in neo-Nazi propaganda".

President Kellyanne Conway's advisor – whose boss regularly assaults the Times – told Tapper "I am very worried" that the newspaper "authorizes the distribution" of the cartoon.

According to newspaper sources who requested anonymity, staff members were alarmed to see that the image was published – and dismayed by the weakness of the initial note of the editor. They wanted a more detailed explanation.

Finally, on Sunday afternoon, the Times issued a statement in which it declared "we are deeply sorry" for the drawing and "we are determined to ensure that nothing like this happens again".

The NYT said the decision to run the cartoon subscribed had been made by a single publisher working without adequate supervision. "The question remains under review and we are evaluating our internal processes and training," the statement said. "We anticipate significant changes."

The paper did not identify the publisher.

In its own story about the scandal, the Times said that "the caricature was drawn by the Portuguese cartoonist António Moreira Antunes and originally published by the Expresso newspaper in Lisbon, and was later taken over by CartoonArts International, a union from around the world … A publisher in the Times Opinion section has uploaded Mr. Antunes' drawing to the union and made the decision to publish it. "

This is the process being reviewed, according to the newspaper.

But some newspaper critics say that there is a deeper problem here.

Bret Stephens, one of the Times' newspaper columnists, spoke about it in Monday's print edition. "The problem with drawing does not lie in the fact that its publication was a voluntary act of anti-Semitism, which was not the case," wrote Stephens. "The problem is that its publication was an astonishing act of ignorance of anti-Semitism – and that, in a publication that is otherwise extremely attentive to almost every conceivable expression of prejudice, from metamorphosis to racial microaggression. to transphobia. "
In the last 6 weeks, churches, mosques and a synagogue have been attacked
Jay Nordlinger, editor at the National Review, congratulated Stephens for writing the article and the Times for having it published. "I wonder how many other publications would do such a thing: allow one of his to wrap it, in his own pages," he tweeted.

The tweets continued to arrive on Monday, when the president equated anti-Semitism with the presidential coverage by the Times.

"The New York Times has apologized for the terrible anti-Semitic cartoon, but it has not apologized for any or all of the fake and corrupt information that they print daily," he said. he writes.

[ad_2]

Source link