[ad_1]
STUFF
NZ Radio wants to expand on TV.
NOTICE: $ 15 Million Announcement of Public Funding for Public Media Broadcast Minister Clare Curran says "New Zealand public media poorly funded", adding $ 216 million currently allocated to the broadcast of this exercise "She may be right, but strangely, the country's most popular public service broadcaster, Radio New Zealand, has received only a small $ 4.5 million of this additional funding for Help him reach more people in different ways, such as
It might be clever to suggest that the minister punishes RNZ for his recent refusal to accept the idea of also directing a large-scale television service, but some observers might see it as well
LAWRENCE SMITH / STUFF
Radio New Zealand Morning Report Presenters Susie Ferguson and Guyon Es Instead, the Minister allocated $ 4 million to NZ On Air to add more local content and $ 6 million to a new innovation fund to boost programming for Maori and Pacific Islanders. and regions.
READ MORE
* RNZ and NZ On Air will share most of the funding
* Warnings for the government before the media funding decision
* Radio New Zealand is expected to name its own ombudsman
* John Campbell resigns from RNZ
Spreading the $ 15 million in three ways seems a little useless when only one organization, preferably NZ On Air whose job is to fund programming local, could have helped RNZ's digital services expand with a grant and it could have created the necessary content for the targeted groups of the Innovation Fund.
SUPPLIED [19659009] Radio New Zealand has received only a small portion of $ 4.5 million of this additional funding to help
Meanwhile, a ministerial advisory group is working on a report on the creation of ################################################################### 39, a public media funding commission, potentially another layer of bureaucracy on the pile of money.
The infrastructure costs of the Ministerial Advisory Group, the Innovation Fund, and a Public Media Financing Commission will all accumulate liquidity that, quite justifiably, should directly finance the achievement of programs.
Clare Curran based his claim that public media are underfunded compared to countries like Denmark and Australia on a 72-page report commissioned by PWC by the Department of Culture and Heritage. It is hard to avoid the feeling that, for the cost of this PWC report, producers and production companies could have done more public media programs than they currently do.
"It is hard to avoid the feeling that, for the cost of this PWC report, producers and production companies could have made more public media programs than they did. are currently doing so. "- Bill Ralston
With the good leadership of Curran's ministerial office, NZ On Air could continue to expand its financing operations for local programming to include not only television and radio stations, but also to provide more documentaries online. news reports on the many local news sites that already exist and already provide excellent video content.
In a planet flooded with international news sites, it is vital that New Zealand has the opportunity to hear and see ours. stories, told in our voices and seen through our eyes. This was the logic behind the creation of NZ On Air in 1989.
The creation of a multiplicity of agencies dealing with the financing of public broadcasting is hardly likely to be the the most effective model that New Zealand could have. In my opinion, the country only needs a funding agency working on radio, television and in the online digital sector. NZ On Air has a proven track record as a single entity.
CHRIS MCKEEN / STUFF
RNZ was successful with its multi-platform show Checkpoint.
– Stuff
Source link
